by David Malpass
Wall Street Journal
May 23, 2012
Currency traders are cheering for Greece to exit the euro. That would create currency volatility and, if other countries exit, mega-profits for traders. The cost would be much lower living standards and even bigger government—including the power to print money—for those exiting the euro.
A disruption in the euro would also be bad for the United States. With North Africa still reeling from the Arab Spring, we have an immense self-interest in strong, growing, sound-money democracies on the Mediterranean's northern shores. They are at risk in the confusion over austerity, growth and the euro.
The conflict between growth and austerity is artificial and framed to favor bigger government. Growth comes from economic freedom within a framework of sound money, property rights, and a rule of law that restrains government overreach. Businesses won't invest or hire as much in an environment where governments dominate the economy. Thus, government austerity is absolutely necessary for economic growth in both the short and long run.
Economics has often ignored the critical distinction between austerity for the government and government-imposed austerity on the private sector. In the former, governments which are over-budget sell assets, restrain their hiring, and limit their mission to essentials. That's growth-oriented austerity.
More
No comments:
Post a Comment