by Matthew Melchiorre
Real Clear Markets
October 31, 2012
Politics in Europe is beginning to resemble Halloween. Trick-or-treaters like Greece and Spain come to the doorstep of Germany and the European Union for bailout money. But these visitors are not polite neighborhood kids asking for a Snickers bar. These are the characters that bring on eye rolls every Halloween as they walk up the front steps.
You know the kid who claws deep into the candy bowl even after you've asked him to only take two pieces of candy... and then comes back a second time for more? That's Greece.
After receiving bailout funding from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and European Union (EU) in May 2010, Greece quickly fell behind in implementing the reforms conditional upon taking the rescue money. But that wasn't enough. Greece came back for a second helping when it received another bailout package in March 2012. And again, Athens has failed to meet targets for shrinking its public sector, privatizing state-owned companies, and boosting competitiveness. Now after reneging on two agreements, Greece is asking for even more time to implement its reforms - doubtless to be followed by yet another thrust into the candy bowl.
More
Wednesday, October 31, 2012
European Politics Increasingly Resemble Halloween
Athens shoots the messenger
Financial Times
Editorial
October 31, 2012
That the investigative journalist and editor Costas Vaxevanis is being put in the dock today for publishing a list of 2,000 Greeks with alleged Swiss bank accounts testifies to the moral bankruptcy of the Greek political class.
The list in question was given to the Greek government two years ago by the then French finance minister, Christine Lagarde. There is no suggestion that all those on the list necessarily have evaded Greek taxes through their Swiss accounts; moreover, the list only covers accounts at a single Geneva-based bank branch. But if, as Mr Vaxevanis and others suggest, the list was shelved and no investigation carried out into the account holders’ fiscal probity, it is a scandal compounded by the misjudged decision to shoot the messenger.
Mr Vaxevanis is charged with violating data protection laws. Whether or not he technically did so, there can be no doubt that he and Hot Doc, his magazine, have acted in the utmost public interest – more than can be said about the state now persecuting him. The judge must set Mr Vaxevanis free.
It was clear from the very start of Athens’ debt crisis that its tax system – if it can be called that – needed complete reform. Greece’s political economy has been based on making outsiders pay for privileges enjoyed by the clients of the main political parties and borrowing abroad to top up. A tax system in which insiders hardly pay and compliant outsiders receive shoddy public services is just the most visible case of political rot.
More
Editorial
October 31, 2012
That the investigative journalist and editor Costas Vaxevanis is being put in the dock today for publishing a list of 2,000 Greeks with alleged Swiss bank accounts testifies to the moral bankruptcy of the Greek political class.
The list in question was given to the Greek government two years ago by the then French finance minister, Christine Lagarde. There is no suggestion that all those on the list necessarily have evaded Greek taxes through their Swiss accounts; moreover, the list only covers accounts at a single Geneva-based bank branch. But if, as Mr Vaxevanis and others suggest, the list was shelved and no investigation carried out into the account holders’ fiscal probity, it is a scandal compounded by the misjudged decision to shoot the messenger.
Mr Vaxevanis is charged with violating data protection laws. Whether or not he technically did so, there can be no doubt that he and Hot Doc, his magazine, have acted in the utmost public interest – more than can be said about the state now persecuting him. The judge must set Mr Vaxevanis free.
It was clear from the very start of Athens’ debt crisis that its tax system – if it can be called that – needed complete reform. Greece’s political economy has been based on making outsiders pay for privileges enjoyed by the clients of the main political parties and borrowing abroad to top up. A tax system in which insiders hardly pay and compliant outsiders receive shoddy public services is just the most visible case of political rot.
More
Fiscal Closing Time?
by Jean Pisani-Ferry
Project Syndicate
October 31, 2012
Is it time for fiscal consolidation or stimulus? Should governments cut or increase spending? Once again the issue is a matter of dispute among policymakers and economists. Citizens, having been told in 2008-2009 that the imperative was to stimulate the economy, and in 2010-2011 that the time had come for retrenchment, are understandably confused. Should priorities once again be reversed?
At the International Monetary Fund’s annual meeting in October, the Fund’s chief economist, Olivier Blanchard fueled the controversy by pointing out that in recent times governments have tended to underestimate the adverse growth consequences of fiscal consolidation. They have typically assumed that to cut public spending by a dollar would reduce GDP by 50 cents in the short term; according to Blanchard, the true outcome in current conditions is a decline by between $0.90-1.70. That is a big gap, but also a perplexing finding: how can there be so much uncertainty?
Contrary to what such forecasting disparities may suggest, economists actually know a lot about the consequences of fiscal policy, at least much more than they used to know. Until the 1980’s, it was routinely assumed that the so-called “multiplier” – the ratio of change in GDP to the change in government spending – was stable and larger than one. A one-dollar spending cut was believed to reduce GDP by more than one dollar, so that fiscal retrenchment was economically costly (while, conversely, stimulus was effective).
More
Project Syndicate
October 31, 2012
Is it time for fiscal consolidation or stimulus? Should governments cut or increase spending? Once again the issue is a matter of dispute among policymakers and economists. Citizens, having been told in 2008-2009 that the imperative was to stimulate the economy, and in 2010-2011 that the time had come for retrenchment, are understandably confused. Should priorities once again be reversed?
At the International Monetary Fund’s annual meeting in October, the Fund’s chief economist, Olivier Blanchard fueled the controversy by pointing out that in recent times governments have tended to underestimate the adverse growth consequences of fiscal consolidation. They have typically assumed that to cut public spending by a dollar would reduce GDP by 50 cents in the short term; according to Blanchard, the true outcome in current conditions is a decline by between $0.90-1.70. That is a big gap, but also a perplexing finding: how can there be so much uncertainty?
Contrary to what such forecasting disparities may suggest, economists actually know a lot about the consequences of fiscal policy, at least much more than they used to know. Until the 1980’s, it was routinely assumed that the so-called “multiplier” – the ratio of change in GDP to the change in government spending – was stable and larger than one. A one-dollar spending cut was believed to reduce GDP by more than one dollar, so that fiscal retrenchment was economically costly (while, conversely, stimulus was effective).
More
Provincial Europe
by Joschka Fischer
Project Syndicate
October 31, 2012
Multitasking is not exactly the strong point of Europe’s current generation of leaders. They have rightly given the eurozone crisis – the central question bearing on the European Union’s future – top priority. But all other important issues – above all, a common foreign and security policy – have been almost completely ignored. And it is here – Europe’s external relations, an issue absolutely vital to the future of all EU citizens – that renationalization is rearing its ugly head again.
Today, we can recognize the outlines of a post-American international (dis)order – not only its emerging structures, but also its risks, threats, and conflicts, all of which are intensifying. For Europe – and for the rest of the world – the financial crisis has proven to be an accelerant of far-reaching changes.
In East Asia, the world’s most dynamic and dominant region in terms of future global economic development, confrontation is escalating between the key powers – China, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan – over border issues, territorial claims, prestige, and unfinished historical business. Add to this the perennial crisis on the Korean peninsula and the Taiwan conflict, which could flare up again anytime.
More
Project Syndicate
October 31, 2012
Multitasking is not exactly the strong point of Europe’s current generation of leaders. They have rightly given the eurozone crisis – the central question bearing on the European Union’s future – top priority. But all other important issues – above all, a common foreign and security policy – have been almost completely ignored. And it is here – Europe’s external relations, an issue absolutely vital to the future of all EU citizens – that renationalization is rearing its ugly head again.
Today, we can recognize the outlines of a post-American international (dis)order – not only its emerging structures, but also its risks, threats, and conflicts, all of which are intensifying. For Europe – and for the rest of the world – the financial crisis has proven to be an accelerant of far-reaching changes.
In East Asia, the world’s most dynamic and dominant region in terms of future global economic development, confrontation is escalating between the key powers – China, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan – over border issues, territorial claims, prestige, and unfinished historical business. Add to this the perennial crisis on the Korean peninsula and the Taiwan conflict, which could flare up again anytime.
More
Tuesday, October 30, 2012
An Optimistic Case for the Euro
by Martin Feldstein
Project Syndicate
October 30, 2012
The prospects for the euro and the eurozone remain uncertain. But recent events at the European Central Bank, in Germany, and in global financial markets, make it worthwhile to consider a favorable scenario for the common currency’s future.
The ECB has promised to buy Italian and Spanish sovereign bonds to keep their interest rates down, provided these countries ask for lines of credit from the European Stability Mechanism and adhere to agreed fiscal reforms. Germany’s Constitutional Court has approved the country’s participation in the ESM, and Chancellor Angela Merkel has given her blessing to the ECB’s bond-buying plan, despite strong public objections from the Bundesbank. And the international bond market has expressed its approval by cutting interest rates on Italy’s ten-year bonds to 4.8%, and on Spain’s to 5.5%.
Italian bond rates had already been falling before ECB President Mario Draghi announced the conditional bond-buying plans. That reflected the substantial progress Italian Prime Minister Mario Monti’s government had already made. New legislation will slow the growth of pension benefits substantially, and the Monti government’s increase in taxes on owner-occupied real estate will raise significant revenue without the adverse incentive effects that would occur if rates for personal-income, payroll, or value-added taxes were raised.
More
Project Syndicate
October 30, 2012
The prospects for the euro and the eurozone remain uncertain. But recent events at the European Central Bank, in Germany, and in global financial markets, make it worthwhile to consider a favorable scenario for the common currency’s future.
The ECB has promised to buy Italian and Spanish sovereign bonds to keep their interest rates down, provided these countries ask for lines of credit from the European Stability Mechanism and adhere to agreed fiscal reforms. Germany’s Constitutional Court has approved the country’s participation in the ESM, and Chancellor Angela Merkel has given her blessing to the ECB’s bond-buying plan, despite strong public objections from the Bundesbank. And the international bond market has expressed its approval by cutting interest rates on Italy’s ten-year bonds to 4.8%, and on Spain’s to 5.5%.
Italian bond rates had already been falling before ECB President Mario Draghi announced the conditional bond-buying plans. That reflected the substantial progress Italian Prime Minister Mario Monti’s government had already made. New legislation will slow the growth of pension benefits substantially, and the Monti government’s increase in taxes on owner-occupied real estate will raise significant revenue without the adverse incentive effects that would occur if rates for personal-income, payroll, or value-added taxes were raised.
More
A Europe of Solidarity, Not Only Discipline
by George Soros
Project Syndicate
October 30, 2012
Originally, the European Union was what psychologists call a “fantastic object,” a desirable goal that inspires people’s imaginations. I saw it as the embodiment of an open society – an association of nation-states that gave up part of their sovereignty for the common good and formed a union dominated by no one nation or nationality.
The euro crisis, however, has turned the EU into something radically different. Member countries are now divided into two classes – creditors and debtors – with the creditors in charge. As the largest and most creditworthy country, Germany occupies a dominant position. Debtor countries pay substantial risk premiums to finance their debt, which is reflected in their high economy-wide borrowing costs. This has pushed them into a deflationary tailspin and put them at a substantial – and potentially permanent – competitive disadvantage vis-à-vis creditor countries.
This outcome does not reflect a deliberate plan, but rather a series of policy mistakes. Germany did not seek to occupy a dominant position in Europe, and it is reluctant to accept the obligations and liabilities that such a position entails. Call this the tragedy of the European Union.
More
Project Syndicate
October 30, 2012
Originally, the European Union was what psychologists call a “fantastic object,” a desirable goal that inspires people’s imaginations. I saw it as the embodiment of an open society – an association of nation-states that gave up part of their sovereignty for the common good and formed a union dominated by no one nation or nationality.
The euro crisis, however, has turned the EU into something radically different. Member countries are now divided into two classes – creditors and debtors – with the creditors in charge. As the largest and most creditworthy country, Germany occupies a dominant position. Debtor countries pay substantial risk premiums to finance their debt, which is reflected in their high economy-wide borrowing costs. This has pushed them into a deflationary tailspin and put them at a substantial – and potentially permanent – competitive disadvantage vis-à-vis creditor countries.
This outcome does not reflect a deliberate plan, but rather a series of policy mistakes. Germany did not seek to occupy a dominant position in Europe, and it is reluctant to accept the obligations and liabilities that such a position entails. Call this the tragedy of the European Union.
More
Greece Moves Quickly to Put Editor on Trial
by Rachel Donadio
New York Times
October 29, 2012
Prosecutors on Monday set a fast-track trial date for the investigative journalist arrested last weekend after publishing a politically sensitive list of Greeks said to have Swiss bank accounts.
The snowballing case has raised questions about press freedom and Greece’s willingness to crack down on tax evasion.
Prosecutors said that Kostas Vaxevanis, the editor of Hot Doc magazine, would be tried Thursday in Athens on charges of interfering with sensitive personal data in a one-hearing procedure that is routine in Greece for misdemeanors. If found guilty, he could face a minimum prison term of one year and a fine of around €30,000, or about $39,000, one of his lawyers said.
Since his arrest on Sunday and release that same day, Mr. Vaxevanis has become a popular symbol as a crusader against a corrupt system, one in which the political class is seen as protecting the interests of the business elite at the expense of ordinary Greeks who are suffering from years of austerity.
The case has also prompted a debate about whether a journalist has the right to defend freedom of the press at the expense of personal privacy.
More
New York Times
October 29, 2012
Prosecutors on Monday set a fast-track trial date for the investigative journalist arrested last weekend after publishing a politically sensitive list of Greeks said to have Swiss bank accounts.
The snowballing case has raised questions about press freedom and Greece’s willingness to crack down on tax evasion.
Prosecutors said that Kostas Vaxevanis, the editor of Hot Doc magazine, would be tried Thursday in Athens on charges of interfering with sensitive personal data in a one-hearing procedure that is routine in Greece for misdemeanors. If found guilty, he could face a minimum prison term of one year and a fine of around €30,000, or about $39,000, one of his lawyers said.
Since his arrest on Sunday and release that same day, Mr. Vaxevanis has become a popular symbol as a crusader against a corrupt system, one in which the political class is seen as protecting the interests of the business elite at the expense of ordinary Greeks who are suffering from years of austerity.
The case has also prompted a debate about whether a journalist has the right to defend freedom of the press at the expense of personal privacy.
More
Monday, October 29, 2012
Greece Arrests the Messenger
New York Times
Editorial
October 29, 2012
Greece’s slow and cumbersome justice system moved with stunning swiftness over the weekend to arrest and charge a respected investigative journalist who published a list of prominent people with Swiss bank accounts. Contrast that with the two years that Greek tax authorities sat on that same list after the French government, which had seized it in a criminal investigation, turned it over to Greece to determine whether some of those Swiss accounts were possibly linked to tax evasion.
Swiss bank accounts are legal, but they can easily be used to avoid paying taxes. Yet a succession of Greek governments, which had pledged to increase tax revenues, failed to investigate the matter. Thanks largely to the decision by the editor Kostas Vaxevanis to publish the list in Hot Doc magazine, several former finance ministers are struggling to explain why.
This list and other lists of offshore accounts in Greek government hands must be fully examined for illegal tax violations. But, so far, the only person charged with wrongdoing is Mr. Vaxevanis. He is accused of violating the privacy of the account holders and faces a possible one-year minimum jail sentence when his case comes to trial on Thursday. Whatever the intricacies of Greek privacy law, this case looks to us, and many other journalists, like selective, and vindictive, prosecution. In a welcome show of support, one of Greece’s leading dailies, Ta Nea, reprinted the list on Monday. The real scandal is the two years of government inaction — which may end as a result of this disclosure.
More
Editorial
October 29, 2012
Greece’s slow and cumbersome justice system moved with stunning swiftness over the weekend to arrest and charge a respected investigative journalist who published a list of prominent people with Swiss bank accounts. Contrast that with the two years that Greek tax authorities sat on that same list after the French government, which had seized it in a criminal investigation, turned it over to Greece to determine whether some of those Swiss accounts were possibly linked to tax evasion.
Swiss bank accounts are legal, but they can easily be used to avoid paying taxes. Yet a succession of Greek governments, which had pledged to increase tax revenues, failed to investigate the matter. Thanks largely to the decision by the editor Kostas Vaxevanis to publish the list in Hot Doc magazine, several former finance ministers are struggling to explain why.
This list and other lists of offshore accounts in Greek government hands must be fully examined for illegal tax violations. But, so far, the only person charged with wrongdoing is Mr. Vaxevanis. He is accused of violating the privacy of the account holders and faces a possible one-year minimum jail sentence when his case comes to trial on Thursday. Whatever the intricacies of Greek privacy law, this case looks to us, and many other journalists, like selective, and vindictive, prosecution. In a welcome show of support, one of Greece’s leading dailies, Ta Nea, reprinted the list on Monday. The real scandal is the two years of government inaction — which may end as a result of this disclosure.
More
Η δημοσίευση της λίστας Λαγκάρντ ως πολιτικός λόγος
του Αριστείδη Χατζή
Τα Νέα
29 Οκτωβρίου 2012
Η δημοσίευση της λίστας Λαγκάρντ θέτει άλλη μία φορά το ζήτημα της σύγκρουσης του ατομικού δικαιώματος για την προστασία ευαίσθητων προσωπικών δεδομένων με την ελευθερία του Τύπου. Προφανώς, η δημοσίευση θέτει σοβαρά νομικά ζητήματα και είναι αρκετά πιθανό να έχει παραβιάσει και την ειδική νομοθεσία για την προστασία προσωπικών δεδομένων αλλά και εκείνη για τη δημοσιοποίηση υλικού της προδικασίας. Αλλά εδώ πρόκειται για κλασική περίπτωση, που μία νομικίστικη απάντηση χάνει οπωσδήποτε το δάσος. Το ερώτημα που πρέπει να απαντήσουμε είναι διαφορετικό: πρέπει να περιορίζεται η ελευθερία του Τύπου από ένα τέτοιο πλέγμα νομικών ρυθμίσεων που, με πρόσχημα την προστασία διαδικασιών, προσώπων ή ακόμα και του «εθνικού συμφέροντος», να απαγορεύει ουσιαστικά στους δημοσιογράφους να ερευνήσουν και να αποκαλύψουν; Η απάντησή μου είναι κατηγορηματική: «Όχι»!
Η ελευθερία του Τύπου έχει πολλές φορές μεγάλο κόστος και γι’ αυτό τον λόγο η ενστικτώδης αντίδραση οδηγεί σε απαγορεύσεις. Όμως το όφελος από έναν ελεύθερο Τύπο είναι μακροπρόθεσμα δυσανάλογα μεγάλο διότι εξασφαλίζει τον έλεγχο μιας κρατικής εξουσίας που είναι πανίσχυρη και, δυστυχώς στην Ελλάδα, αδιαίρετη, ενώ ταυτόχρονα αποτελεί το μόνο εμπόδιο απέναντι σε πανίσχυρες πολιτικές και οικονομικές ομάδες πίεσης που διαπλέκονται με το κράτος και προστατεύονται από αυτό. Το κόστος όμως είναι υπαρκτό και για τον λόγο αυτό η στάθμιση πρέπει να το λαμβάνει σοβαρά υπόψη, ακόμα και όταν το τεκμήριο υπέρ της ελευθερίας του Τύπου είναι σχεδόν αμάχητο – όπως προτείνω. Ετσι, το κόστος για τις οροθετικές γυναίκες τα ονόματα των οποίων δημοσιεύθηκαν και μάλιστα από κρατικές υπηρεσίες είναι δυσβάστακτο, ενώ το κοινωνικό όφελος ιδιαίτερα αμφίβολο. Αντίθετα, στην περίπτωση της λίστας Λαγκάρντ, ο αμφιλεγόμενος πολιτικός χειρισμός της αλλά επίσης η σπουδή και η αποτελεσματικότητα που επέδειξαν οι Αρχές στη δίωξη του δημοσιογράφου αποτελούν ικανοποιητικές ενδείξεις για τη χρησιμότητα της δημοσίευσής της.
Όμως, τελικά, όλα αυτά δεν έχουν τόση σημασία όσο έχει κάτι άλλο: ο δημοσιογράφος που διακινδυνεύει και την ελευθερία του ακόμα για να δημοσιεύσει αυτή τη λίστα το κάνει επιπλέον και για πολιτικούς λόγους. Στη δημοσίευση τον υποχρεώνει όχι μόνο ο κοινωνικός του ρόλος αλλά και οι πολιτικές του πεποιθήσεις, που είναι διπλά υποχρεωμένος να τις εκφράσει. Με τις πολιτικές απόψεις του κ. Βαξεβάνη συχνά διαφωνώ. Αυτός είναι ένας επιπλέον λόγος να υποστηρίξω την ελεύθερη έκφραση του πολιτικού του λόγου και να απαιτήσω από το ελληνικό κράτος να του επιτρέψει να εκφραστεί ελεύθερα με όποιον τρόπο θεωρεί αυτός, ως δημοσιογράφος, πρόσφορο. Το δικαίωμά του στην ελεύθερη έκφραση προηγείται οιουδήποτε άλλου.
Εδώ θα βρεις το κείμενο όπως δημοσιεύθηκε στα Νέα.
Εδώ μπορείς να κατεβάσεις το κείμενο σε μορφή PDF μαζί με τα κείμενα για το ίδιο θέμα των συνταγματολόγων και συναδέλφων Στ. Τσακυράκη και Κ. Χρυσόγονου.
Τα Νέα
29 Οκτωβρίου 2012
Η δημοσίευση της λίστας Λαγκάρντ θέτει άλλη μία φορά το ζήτημα της σύγκρουσης του ατομικού δικαιώματος για την προστασία ευαίσθητων προσωπικών δεδομένων με την ελευθερία του Τύπου. Προφανώς, η δημοσίευση θέτει σοβαρά νομικά ζητήματα και είναι αρκετά πιθανό να έχει παραβιάσει και την ειδική νομοθεσία για την προστασία προσωπικών δεδομένων αλλά και εκείνη για τη δημοσιοποίηση υλικού της προδικασίας. Αλλά εδώ πρόκειται για κλασική περίπτωση, που μία νομικίστικη απάντηση χάνει οπωσδήποτε το δάσος. Το ερώτημα που πρέπει να απαντήσουμε είναι διαφορετικό: πρέπει να περιορίζεται η ελευθερία του Τύπου από ένα τέτοιο πλέγμα νομικών ρυθμίσεων που, με πρόσχημα την προστασία διαδικασιών, προσώπων ή ακόμα και του «εθνικού συμφέροντος», να απαγορεύει ουσιαστικά στους δημοσιογράφους να ερευνήσουν και να αποκαλύψουν; Η απάντησή μου είναι κατηγορηματική: «Όχι»!
Η ελευθερία του Τύπου έχει πολλές φορές μεγάλο κόστος και γι’ αυτό τον λόγο η ενστικτώδης αντίδραση οδηγεί σε απαγορεύσεις. Όμως το όφελος από έναν ελεύθερο Τύπο είναι μακροπρόθεσμα δυσανάλογα μεγάλο διότι εξασφαλίζει τον έλεγχο μιας κρατικής εξουσίας που είναι πανίσχυρη και, δυστυχώς στην Ελλάδα, αδιαίρετη, ενώ ταυτόχρονα αποτελεί το μόνο εμπόδιο απέναντι σε πανίσχυρες πολιτικές και οικονομικές ομάδες πίεσης που διαπλέκονται με το κράτος και προστατεύονται από αυτό. Το κόστος όμως είναι υπαρκτό και για τον λόγο αυτό η στάθμιση πρέπει να το λαμβάνει σοβαρά υπόψη, ακόμα και όταν το τεκμήριο υπέρ της ελευθερίας του Τύπου είναι σχεδόν αμάχητο – όπως προτείνω. Ετσι, το κόστος για τις οροθετικές γυναίκες τα ονόματα των οποίων δημοσιεύθηκαν και μάλιστα από κρατικές υπηρεσίες είναι δυσβάστακτο, ενώ το κοινωνικό όφελος ιδιαίτερα αμφίβολο. Αντίθετα, στην περίπτωση της λίστας Λαγκάρντ, ο αμφιλεγόμενος πολιτικός χειρισμός της αλλά επίσης η σπουδή και η αποτελεσματικότητα που επέδειξαν οι Αρχές στη δίωξη του δημοσιογράφου αποτελούν ικανοποιητικές ενδείξεις για τη χρησιμότητα της δημοσίευσής της.
Όμως, τελικά, όλα αυτά δεν έχουν τόση σημασία όσο έχει κάτι άλλο: ο δημοσιογράφος που διακινδυνεύει και την ελευθερία του ακόμα για να δημοσιεύσει αυτή τη λίστα το κάνει επιπλέον και για πολιτικούς λόγους. Στη δημοσίευση τον υποχρεώνει όχι μόνο ο κοινωνικός του ρόλος αλλά και οι πολιτικές του πεποιθήσεις, που είναι διπλά υποχρεωμένος να τις εκφράσει. Με τις πολιτικές απόψεις του κ. Βαξεβάνη συχνά διαφωνώ. Αυτός είναι ένας επιπλέον λόγος να υποστηρίξω την ελεύθερη έκφραση του πολιτικού του λόγου και να απαιτήσω από το ελληνικό κράτος να του επιτρέψει να εκφραστεί ελεύθερα με όποιον τρόπο θεωρεί αυτός, ως δημοσιογράφος, πρόσφορο. Το δικαίωμά του στην ελεύθερη έκφραση προηγείται οιουδήποτε άλλου.
Εδώ θα βρεις το κείμενο όπως δημοσιεύθηκε στα Νέα.
Εδώ μπορείς να κατεβάσεις το κείμενο σε μορφή PDF μαζί με τα κείμενα για το ίδιο θέμα των συνταγματολόγων και συναδέλφων Στ. Τσακυράκη και Κ. Χρυσόγονου.
The first step in Europe’s banking union is achievable, but it won’t be easy
by Nicolas Véron
Vox
October 29, 2012
Eurozone leaders are firmly committed to a banking union, at least on paper. But do Member States agree on the current proposals? And what do these proposals leave out? This column argues that a dangerous combination of disagreements between Member States over contentious issues and pitfalls in the design of new institutions may well ensnare the Eurozone along its faltering path towards recovery.
The leaders of Eurozone countries issued an unprecedented commitment on 29 June; the statement began, “[w]e affirm that it is imperative to break the vicious circle between banks and sovereigns” (Euro Area Leaders 2012). This statement officially acknowledged leaders’ intention to break the ‘doom loop’ of the mutually-reinforcing deterioration of credit conditions afflicting weaker member states such as Spain and the banks headquartered in them. Severing this feedback loop will require a transfer of vast parts of banking supervision and policy apparatus from national- to European-level in the form of a new banking union. This transfer is probably a prerequisite for maintaining the integrity of Europe’s monetary union in any crisis-resolution strategy. Of equal importance is that leaders’ failure to deliver on their pledge would severely impair investors’ already-damaged confidence in the ability of Eurozone governments to act collectively.
The action plan outlined in the June statement defines a sequence of two explicit steps.
Vox
October 29, 2012
Eurozone leaders are firmly committed to a banking union, at least on paper. But do Member States agree on the current proposals? And what do these proposals leave out? This column argues that a dangerous combination of disagreements between Member States over contentious issues and pitfalls in the design of new institutions may well ensnare the Eurozone along its faltering path towards recovery.
The leaders of Eurozone countries issued an unprecedented commitment on 29 June; the statement began, “[w]e affirm that it is imperative to break the vicious circle between banks and sovereigns” (Euro Area Leaders 2012). This statement officially acknowledged leaders’ intention to break the ‘doom loop’ of the mutually-reinforcing deterioration of credit conditions afflicting weaker member states such as Spain and the banks headquartered in them. Severing this feedback loop will require a transfer of vast parts of banking supervision and policy apparatus from national- to European-level in the form of a new banking union. This transfer is probably a prerequisite for maintaining the integrity of Europe’s monetary union in any crisis-resolution strategy. Of equal importance is that leaders’ failure to deliver on their pledge would severely impair investors’ already-damaged confidence in the ability of Eurozone governments to act collectively.
The action plan outlined in the June statement defines a sequence of two explicit steps.
- The ECB should first be endowed with broad supervisory powers and thus become the anchor of a ‘single supervisory mechanism’ for participating Member States.
- Once the single supervisory mechanism is deemed effective, the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) - the Eurozone’s newly-established intervention fund - would be able to recapitalise banks directly. Corresponding instruments are yet to be clarified, but would probably include common equity.
Sunday, October 28, 2012
List of Swiss Accounts Turns Up the Heat in Greece
New York Times
October 27, 2012
The speaker of the Greek Parliament, several employees of the Finance Ministry and a number of business leaders are on a list of more than 2,000 Greeks said to have accounts in a Swiss bank, according to a respected investigative magazine. The Greek magazine, Hot Doc, published the list on Saturday, raising the stakes in a heated battle over which current and former government officials had seen the original list passed on by France two years ago — and whether they had used it to check for possible tax evasion.
Hot Doc said its version of the list matches the one that Christine Lagarde, then the French finance minister and now the head of the International Monetary Fund, had given her Greek counterpart in 2010 to help Greece crack down on rampant tax evasion as it was trying to steady its economy. The 2,059 people on the list are said to have had accounts in a Geneva branch of HSBC.
Questions about the handling of the original list reached a near frenzy in Athens last week as two former finance ministers were pressed to explain why the government appeared to have taken no action on the list. The subject has touched a nerve among average Greeks at a time when the Parliament is expected to vote on a new 13.5 billion euro austerity package that could further reduce their standards of living.
The publication of the list is likely to exacerbate Greeks’ anger that their political leaders might have been reluctant to investigate the business elite, with whom they often have close ties, even as middle- and lower-class Greeks have struggled with higher taxes and increasingly ardent tax collectors.
More
October 27, 2012
The speaker of the Greek Parliament, several employees of the Finance Ministry and a number of business leaders are on a list of more than 2,000 Greeks said to have accounts in a Swiss bank, according to a respected investigative magazine. The Greek magazine, Hot Doc, published the list on Saturday, raising the stakes in a heated battle over which current and former government officials had seen the original list passed on by France two years ago — and whether they had used it to check for possible tax evasion.
Hot Doc said its version of the list matches the one that Christine Lagarde, then the French finance minister and now the head of the International Monetary Fund, had given her Greek counterpart in 2010 to help Greece crack down on rampant tax evasion as it was trying to steady its economy. The 2,059 people on the list are said to have had accounts in a Geneva branch of HSBC.
Questions about the handling of the original list reached a near frenzy in Athens last week as two former finance ministers were pressed to explain why the government appeared to have taken no action on the list. The subject has touched a nerve among average Greeks at a time when the Parliament is expected to vote on a new 13.5 billion euro austerity package that could further reduce their standards of living.
The publication of the list is likely to exacerbate Greeks’ anger that their political leaders might have been reluctant to investigate the business elite, with whom they often have close ties, even as middle- and lower-class Greeks have struggled with higher taxes and increasingly ardent tax collectors.
More
Friday, October 26, 2012
Love or nothing: The real Greek parallel with Weimar
by Paul Mason
BBC News
October 26, 2012
Of all the operas written during Germany's Weimar Republic (1919-33), probably the most haunting is the last.
Kurt Weill's The Silver Lake, written with playwright Georg Kaiser, tells the story of two losers - a good-hearted provincial cop and the thief he has shot and wounded - as they make their way through a society ruined by unemployment, corruption and vice.
After spending a week again in Greece - amid riots, hunger and far right violence - I finally understood it.
The opera was meant to be Weill's path back into the mainstream. It was his first break from collaborating with Bertolt Brecht, and was scheduled to open simultaneously in three German cities on 18 February 1933.
But on 30 January Adolf Hitler was appointed Germany's chancellor.
More
BBC News
October 26, 2012
Of all the operas written during Germany's Weimar Republic (1919-33), probably the most haunting is the last.
Kurt Weill's The Silver Lake, written with playwright Georg Kaiser, tells the story of two losers - a good-hearted provincial cop and the thief he has shot and wounded - as they make their way through a society ruined by unemployment, corruption and vice.
After spending a week again in Greece - amid riots, hunger and far right violence - I finally understood it.
The opera was meant to be Weill's path back into the mainstream. It was his first break from collaborating with Bertolt Brecht, and was scheduled to open simultaneously in three German cities on 18 February 1933.
But on 30 January Adolf Hitler was appointed Germany's chancellor.
More
Golden Dawn has infiltrated Greek police, claims officer
Guardian
October 26, 2012
A senior Greek police officer has claimed that the far-right Golden Dawn party has infiltrated the police at various levels. He has laid the blame on consecutive governments and the leadership of the police force for turning a blind eye to what he describes as "pockets of fascism".
Speaking to the Guardian on condition of anonymity, the officer said the Greek state had been fully aware of the activities of Golden Dawn for several years, with the National Intelligence Service and other security agencies monitoring it closely. The officer claimed police chiefs had had the opportunity to isolate and remove these small "pockets of fascism" in the force but decided not to. The state, he said, wanted to keep the fascist elements "in reserve" and use them for its own purposes.
The officer said he believed that Golden Dawn members could be used against the Greek left, which has led popular street protests against the government and austerity measures imposed by the EU. He expressed his belief that neo-fascist groups may already have acted as agents provocateurs during demonstrations across the country, to provoke clashes between demonstrators and the police or even between demonstrators themselves.
More
October 26, 2012
A senior Greek police officer has claimed that the far-right Golden Dawn party has infiltrated the police at various levels. He has laid the blame on consecutive governments and the leadership of the police force for turning a blind eye to what he describes as "pockets of fascism".
Speaking to the Guardian on condition of anonymity, the officer said the Greek state had been fully aware of the activities of Golden Dawn for several years, with the National Intelligence Service and other security agencies monitoring it closely. The officer claimed police chiefs had had the opportunity to isolate and remove these small "pockets of fascism" in the force but decided not to. The state, he said, wanted to keep the fascist elements "in reserve" and use them for its own purposes.
The officer said he believed that Golden Dawn members could be used against the Greek left, which has led popular street protests against the government and austerity measures imposed by the EU. He expressed his belief that neo-fascist groups may already have acted as agents provocateurs during demonstrations across the country, to provoke clashes between demonstrators and the police or even between demonstrators themselves.
Greece Faces Need for Additional Assistance
Wall Street Journal
October 25, 2012
Greece will need an extra €30 billion ($39 billion) in aid from its international creditors through 2016 to make up for a deeper-than-expected recession and a two-year delay in budget targets, senior European finance-ministry officials were told Thursday in their first detailed discussion on how to keep the debt-ridden country in the euro zone.
Finding a solution to Greece's debt dilemma is set to occupy euro-zone policy makers for much of the autumn, forcing them to make politically unpopular decisions just as they try to stabilize larger countries like Spain.
The extra funds would mean Greece's debt load would still be around 140% of annual economic output by 2020, said two European officials. That is far above the 120% that was deemed sustainable when the country's second bailout package was agreed upon in February. Because of that, the International Monetary Fund continues to push euro-zone governments and the European Central Bank to write off some of the money they have lent to Greece—an option that remains unacceptable to most governments, the officials said.
More
October 25, 2012
Greece will need an extra €30 billion ($39 billion) in aid from its international creditors through 2016 to make up for a deeper-than-expected recession and a two-year delay in budget targets, senior European finance-ministry officials were told Thursday in their first detailed discussion on how to keep the debt-ridden country in the euro zone.
Finding a solution to Greece's debt dilemma is set to occupy euro-zone policy makers for much of the autumn, forcing them to make politically unpopular decisions just as they try to stabilize larger countries like Spain.
The extra funds would mean Greece's debt load would still be around 140% of annual economic output by 2020, said two European officials. That is far above the 120% that was deemed sustainable when the country's second bailout package was agreed upon in February. Because of that, the International Monetary Fund continues to push euro-zone governments and the European Central Bank to write off some of the money they have lent to Greece—an option that remains unacceptable to most governments, the officials said.
More
Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Greek police accused over racism and asylum rights
by Paul Mason
BBC News
October 24, 2012
Newsnight's report on the Greek far-right party Golden Dawn made headlines across Europe last week.
In it, MP Ilias Panagiotaros claimed Greece was "in civil war" and indeed advocated a new kind of civil war, pitting the far-right against migrants, anarchists, etc.
Within 24 hours Mr Panagiotaros had retracted his claim that Greece was "in civil war", saying instead "there is no civil war" and accusing Newsnight of "paraphrasing" his words. We had simply broadcast them, un-edited and in English.
“Start Quote
Fifteen protesters have told us they intend to bring a case against the Athens police”
Now three new reports cast light on the substance of our story - which was: alleged police torture of anti-fascist detainees, Golden Dawn's influence inside the Greek police force, and its potential influence on the operational behaviour and priorities of the police in the Attica region around Athens.
Today, lawyers for 15 protesters who claim they were mistreated and abused in police detention, have shown Newsnight coroners' reports on eight of the detainees.
The most serious of the coroners' documents confirms "grievous bodily harm caused by a sharp and blunt object," requiring the victim to be off work for a month.
Another describes a kind of injury that is consistent with being caused by a taser, as claimed in the original Guardian report.
Fifteen protesters have told us they intend to bring a case against the Athens police.
A second report issued yesterday by the UN High Commissioner for Refugees contains figures for racial attacks in Greece, which are not routinely collected by the Greek government.
More
Read the Report
BBC News
October 24, 2012
Newsnight's report on the Greek far-right party Golden Dawn made headlines across Europe last week.
In it, MP Ilias Panagiotaros claimed Greece was "in civil war" and indeed advocated a new kind of civil war, pitting the far-right against migrants, anarchists, etc.
Within 24 hours Mr Panagiotaros had retracted his claim that Greece was "in civil war", saying instead "there is no civil war" and accusing Newsnight of "paraphrasing" his words. We had simply broadcast them, un-edited and in English.
“Start Quote
Fifteen protesters have told us they intend to bring a case against the Athens police”
Now three new reports cast light on the substance of our story - which was: alleged police torture of anti-fascist detainees, Golden Dawn's influence inside the Greek police force, and its potential influence on the operational behaviour and priorities of the police in the Attica region around Athens.
Today, lawyers for 15 protesters who claim they were mistreated and abused in police detention, have shown Newsnight coroners' reports on eight of the detainees.
The most serious of the coroners' documents confirms "grievous bodily harm caused by a sharp and blunt object," requiring the victim to be off work for a month.
Another describes a kind of injury that is consistent with being caused by a taser, as claimed in the original Guardian report.
Fifteen protesters have told us they intend to bring a case against the Athens police.
A second report issued yesterday by the UN High Commissioner for Refugees contains figures for racial attacks in Greece, which are not routinely collected by the Greek government.
More
Read the Report
Eurostat: Στο 150,5% του ΑΕΠ το ελληνικό χρέος
Ναυτεμπορική
24 Οκτωβρίου 2012
Το υψηλότερο δημόσιο χρέος στην Ευρώπη εμφάνισε η Ελλάδα στο δεύτερο τρίμηνο του 2012, όπως προκύπτει από τα στοιχεία που έδωσε σήμερα στη δημοσιότητα η Eurostat
Συγκεκριμένα, σύμφωνα με την κοινοτική στατιστική υπηρεσία, το ελληνικό χρέος αυξήθηκε στο 150,5% του ΑΕΠ (300,8 δισ. ευρώ) από 136,9% του ΑΕΠ (280,4 δισ. ευρώ) που ήταν στο πρώτο τρίμηνο του έτους.
Μετά την Ελλάδα, τα υψηλότερα χρέη ως ποσοστά του ΑΕΠ καταγράφονται στην Ιταλία (126,1%), την Πορτογαλία (117,5%) και την Ιρλανδία (111,5%). Στον αντίποδα, το χαμηλότερα ποσοστά καταγράφονται στην Εσθονία (7,3%), τη Βουλγαρία (16,5%) και το Λουξεμβούργο (20,9%).
Περισσότερα
24 Οκτωβρίου 2012
Το υψηλότερο δημόσιο χρέος στην Ευρώπη εμφάνισε η Ελλάδα στο δεύτερο τρίμηνο του 2012, όπως προκύπτει από τα στοιχεία που έδωσε σήμερα στη δημοσιότητα η Eurostat
Συγκεκριμένα, σύμφωνα με την κοινοτική στατιστική υπηρεσία, το ελληνικό χρέος αυξήθηκε στο 150,5% του ΑΕΠ (300,8 δισ. ευρώ) από 136,9% του ΑΕΠ (280,4 δισ. ευρώ) που ήταν στο πρώτο τρίμηνο του έτους.
Μετά την Ελλάδα, τα υψηλότερα χρέη ως ποσοστά του ΑΕΠ καταγράφονται στην Ιταλία (126,1%), την Πορτογαλία (117,5%) και την Ιρλανδία (111,5%). Στον αντίποδα, το χαμηλότερα ποσοστά καταγράφονται στην Εσθονία (7,3%), τη Βουλγαρία (16,5%) και το Λουξεμβούργο (20,9%).
Περισσότερα
Tuesday, October 23, 2012
Hedge Funds Hot for Ailing Greece's Debt
Wall Street Journal
October 23, 2012
One of the hottest trades of the past few months has been the bonds of a country so shaken by economic and social turmoil that a neo-Nazi party is running third in the polls.
That's right: Hedge funds have been buying Greece.
Ever since Greece completed a debt restructuring in March that turned €200 billion in bonds into about €60 billion, distressed-debt investors—many at U.S. hedge funds—have been picking them over. Hedge-fund analysts have flooded Greek finance officials with requests for information. Prices have climbed.
Third Point LLC, based in New York, crowed about Greece in its investor letter earlier this month, citing the resilience of the bonds of fellow bailout-recipient Portugal. "We expected Greece to keep its head up and undergo a similar metamorphosis," the letter said.
Other buyers include Greylock Capital Management, a New York hedge fund specializing in distressed debt that has been bullish on Greece for months, and Fir Tree Partners, a New York-based multistrategy fund with $8 billion under management.
More
See also
October 23, 2012
One of the hottest trades of the past few months has been the bonds of a country so shaken by economic and social turmoil that a neo-Nazi party is running third in the polls.
That's right: Hedge funds have been buying Greece.
Ever since Greece completed a debt restructuring in March that turned €200 billion in bonds into about €60 billion, distressed-debt investors—many at U.S. hedge funds—have been picking them over. Hedge-fund analysts have flooded Greek finance officials with requests for information. Prices have climbed.
Third Point LLC, based in New York, crowed about Greece in its investor letter earlier this month, citing the resilience of the bonds of fellow bailout-recipient Portugal. "We expected Greece to keep its head up and undergo a similar metamorphosis," the letter said.
Other buyers include Greylock Capital Management, a New York hedge fund specializing in distressed debt that has been bullish on Greece for months, and Fir Tree Partners, a New York-based multistrategy fund with $8 billion under management.
More
See also
That's Right: Hedge Funds Are Buying Greece
Wall Street Journal
October 23, 2012
One of the hottest trades of the past few months has been the bonds of a country so shaken by economic and social turmoil that a neo-Nazi party is running third in the polls. Charles Forelle has details on Markets Hub.
More
See also
October 23, 2012
One of the hottest trades of the past few months has been the bonds of a country so shaken by economic and social turmoil that a neo-Nazi party is running third in the polls. Charles Forelle has details on Markets Hub.
More
See also
Βελτίωση των συνθηκών στην ελληνική επιχειρηματικότητα
Καθημερινή
23 Οκτωβρίου 2012
Μια θετική διάκριση κέρδισε η Ελλάδα όσον αφορά τις συνθήκες εντός των οποίων καλούνται να λειτουργήσουν οι επιχειρήσεις, σύμφωνα με την έκθεση Doing Business 2013 που συντάσσεται από την Παγκόσμια Τράπεζα. Η Ελλάδα ανέβηκε στη σχετική κατάσταση από την 89ή θέση το που κατέλαβε στην έκθεση του 2012 στην 78ή εφέτος, όντας μια από τις δέκα χώρες που σημείωσαν την σημαντικότερη πρόοδο τα τελευταία δύο χρόνια. «Μια από τις λύσεις στο πρόβλημα του υψηλού χρέους είναι η ανάκαμψη της οικονομίας και αναγνωρίζεται ευρέως ότι η δημιουργία ευνοϊκότερου κλίματος για τις επιχειρήσεις είναι βασική προϋπόθεση) για την επίτευξη αυτού του στόχου», αναφέρεται στην έκθεση όπου εκτιμάται ότι η βελτίωση που παρατηρείται στην Ελλάδα και σε άλλες οικονομίες του ευρωπαϊκού Νότου οφείλεται, τουλάχιστον εν μέρει, στην πίεση που ασκείται από την κρίση χρέους. Η θετική διάκριση για την Ελλάδα οφείλεται στο γεγονός ότι εφάρμοσε κανονιστικές μεταρρυθμίσεις σε τρεις τομείς, «βελτιώνοντας πέρυσι το κανονιστικό πλαίσιο με ταχύτερο ρυθμό απ’ ό,τι σε οποιοδήποτε από τα προηγούμενα έξι χρόνια», αναφέρεται στην έκθεση. Επιτάχυνε τη διαδικασία έκδοσης οικοδομικής άδειας μεταφέροντας τη σχετική διαδικασία από τις πολεοδομίες σε εγκεκριμένους ιδιώτες και ορίζοντας ανώτατο χρονικό όριο για την ολοκλήρωση της διαδικασίας. Ενίσχυσε την προστασία των επενδυτών απαιτώντας μεγαλύτερη διαφάνεια μέσω της πρόσβασης σε πληροφορίες και εισήγαγε νέα διαδικασία εκκαθάρισης με στόχο να είναι ευκολότερη η διάσωση εταιρειών που απειλούνται με πτώχευση.
Από το 2004 η ελληνικές κυβερνήσεις έχουν εφαρμόσει 17 θεσμικές ή κανονιστικές μεταρρυθμίσεις προκειμένου να ενισχύσουν το επιχειρηματικό κλίμα στη χώρα, όσες και η Ισπανία, η Πορτογαλία 25 και η Ιταλία 14. Ωστόσο, οι υπόλοιπες τρεις χώρες προηγούνται λίγο (Ιταλία 73ή) ή πολύ (Πορτογαλία 30ή και Ισπανία 44ή) από την Ελλάδα όσον αφορά την ευκολία του επιχειρείν. Παρ’ όλα αυτά η Ελλάδα συγκαταλέγεται μεταξύ των χωρών της Ευρωπαϊκής Ενωσης που μείωσαν περισσότερο την απόσταση που τις χωρίζει από την κορυφή του καταλόγου, συγκεκριμένα μείωσε την απόσταση κατά 8,2% από το 2005. Ταυτόχρονα αυτά τα στοιχεία αναδεικνύουν πόσο πίσω ήταν και εξακολουθεί να είναι η Ελλάδα όσον αφορά τη δημιουργία κλίματος που θα είναι ελκυστικό για τις επιχειρήσεις. Για παράδειγμα, η Ελλάδα συγκαταλέγεται μεταξύ των χωρών όπου η καταχώρηση ακινήτου απαιτεί μεγάλο αριθμό γραφειοκρατικών διαδικασιών, συγκεκριμένα 11, ενώ σε χώρες όπως η Πορτογαλία, η Σουηδία, η Γεωργία, απαιτείται μόνο μία.
Περισσότερα
Διαβάστε την έκθεση
23 Οκτωβρίου 2012
Μια θετική διάκριση κέρδισε η Ελλάδα όσον αφορά τις συνθήκες εντός των οποίων καλούνται να λειτουργήσουν οι επιχειρήσεις, σύμφωνα με την έκθεση Doing Business 2013 που συντάσσεται από την Παγκόσμια Τράπεζα. Η Ελλάδα ανέβηκε στη σχετική κατάσταση από την 89ή θέση το που κατέλαβε στην έκθεση του 2012 στην 78ή εφέτος, όντας μια από τις δέκα χώρες που σημείωσαν την σημαντικότερη πρόοδο τα τελευταία δύο χρόνια. «Μια από τις λύσεις στο πρόβλημα του υψηλού χρέους είναι η ανάκαμψη της οικονομίας και αναγνωρίζεται ευρέως ότι η δημιουργία ευνοϊκότερου κλίματος για τις επιχειρήσεις είναι βασική προϋπόθεση) για την επίτευξη αυτού του στόχου», αναφέρεται στην έκθεση όπου εκτιμάται ότι η βελτίωση που παρατηρείται στην Ελλάδα και σε άλλες οικονομίες του ευρωπαϊκού Νότου οφείλεται, τουλάχιστον εν μέρει, στην πίεση που ασκείται από την κρίση χρέους. Η θετική διάκριση για την Ελλάδα οφείλεται στο γεγονός ότι εφάρμοσε κανονιστικές μεταρρυθμίσεις σε τρεις τομείς, «βελτιώνοντας πέρυσι το κανονιστικό πλαίσιο με ταχύτερο ρυθμό απ’ ό,τι σε οποιοδήποτε από τα προηγούμενα έξι χρόνια», αναφέρεται στην έκθεση. Επιτάχυνε τη διαδικασία έκδοσης οικοδομικής άδειας μεταφέροντας τη σχετική διαδικασία από τις πολεοδομίες σε εγκεκριμένους ιδιώτες και ορίζοντας ανώτατο χρονικό όριο για την ολοκλήρωση της διαδικασίας. Ενίσχυσε την προστασία των επενδυτών απαιτώντας μεγαλύτερη διαφάνεια μέσω της πρόσβασης σε πληροφορίες και εισήγαγε νέα διαδικασία εκκαθάρισης με στόχο να είναι ευκολότερη η διάσωση εταιρειών που απειλούνται με πτώχευση.
Από το 2004 η ελληνικές κυβερνήσεις έχουν εφαρμόσει 17 θεσμικές ή κανονιστικές μεταρρυθμίσεις προκειμένου να ενισχύσουν το επιχειρηματικό κλίμα στη χώρα, όσες και η Ισπανία, η Πορτογαλία 25 και η Ιταλία 14. Ωστόσο, οι υπόλοιπες τρεις χώρες προηγούνται λίγο (Ιταλία 73ή) ή πολύ (Πορτογαλία 30ή και Ισπανία 44ή) από την Ελλάδα όσον αφορά την ευκολία του επιχειρείν. Παρ’ όλα αυτά η Ελλάδα συγκαταλέγεται μεταξύ των χωρών της Ευρωπαϊκής Ενωσης που μείωσαν περισσότερο την απόσταση που τις χωρίζει από την κορυφή του καταλόγου, συγκεκριμένα μείωσε την απόσταση κατά 8,2% από το 2005. Ταυτόχρονα αυτά τα στοιχεία αναδεικνύουν πόσο πίσω ήταν και εξακολουθεί να είναι η Ελλάδα όσον αφορά τη δημιουργία κλίματος που θα είναι ελκυστικό για τις επιχειρήσεις. Για παράδειγμα, η Ελλάδα συγκαταλέγεται μεταξύ των χωρών όπου η καταχώρηση ακινήτου απαιτεί μεγάλο αριθμό γραφειοκρατικών διαδικασιών, συγκεκριμένα 11, ενώ σε χώρες όπως η Πορτογαλία, η Σουηδία, η Γεωργία, απαιτείται μόνο μία.
Περισσότερα
Διαβάστε την έκθεση
Χατζής: Η σκληρή λιτότητα θα αποτύχει αν δεν συνοδευτεί από μεταρρυθμίσεις. Όχι στις οριζόντιες περικοπές.
Συνέντευξη στη Zωή Λεουδάκη
Voice of America/Φωνή της Αμερικής
23 Οκτωβρίου 2012
O Αριστείδης Χατζής, Αναπληρωτής Καθηγητής Φιλοσοφίας Δικαίου & Θεωρίας Θεσμών του Πανεπιστήμιου Αθηνών συμμετείχε στο Συνέδριο του Ινστιτούτου CΑΤΟ στην Ουάσιγκτον για την κρίση στην Ευρώπη και το κοινωνικό κράτος.
VOA: Καλωσορίσατε στην Ουάσιγκτον. Στην ομιλία σας αναφερθήκατε στην ελληνική κρίση. Ποια νομίζετε ότι μπορεί να είναι μερικά βήματα προς την σωστή κατεύθυνση για την αντιμετώπισή της;
Α. Χατζής: Για μένα το πιο σημαντικό και μοναδικό που δεν έχει γίνει είναι οι μεταρρυθμίσεις. Χωρίς δομικές μεταρρυθμίσεις που θα αλλάξουν τη δομή της ελληνικής κοινωνίας δεν μπορεί να υπάρξει καμία πρόοδος. Και αν υπάρχει μια μεταρρύθμιση, μία, την οποία θα επέλεγα ως την πιο σημαντική, είναι το άνοιγμα της αγοράς. Εδώ υπάρχει ένα πρόβλημα, μία λάθος αντιμετώπιση των ελλήνων και των ελίτ, αλλά και των πολιτών. Από που έρχεται ο πλούτος; Από τα δάνεια; Από τις επιδοτήσεις της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης; Από το κράτος το οποίο θα επενδύσει; Όχι, έρχεται από την αγορά. Πρέπει να υπάρχει μια αγορά που να λειτουργεί. Ε, λοιπόν αυτή η αγορά δεν υπάρχει, γι’ αυτό έχουμε πάνω από ένα εκατομμύριο ανέργους αυτή τη στιγμή στη Ελλάδα, διότι δεν υπάρχει μια ιδιωτική αγορά να τους προσλάβει.
VOA: Υπάρχουν όμως πολλές αντιδράσεις. Πως μπορούν ν’ αντιμετωπιστούν;
Α. Χατζής: Αγορά σημαίνει ανταγωνισμός. Εφόσον λειτουργεί καλά η αγορά και ο ανταγωνισμός είναι σκληρός όλοι θα πρέπει να αποδείξουν σ’ αυτόν του οποίου ζητάνε τα χρήματα ότι του προσφέρουν αυτό το οποίο αναζητά και αξίζει τα χρήματά του. Αυτό είναι δύσκολο. Τον ανταγωνισμό τον μισούν πάρα πολλοί. Κατ’ αρχήν τον μισούν ο επιχειρήσεις. Μια μεγάλη επιχείρηση με ένα μεγάλο μερίδιο στη αγορά θέλει να το διατηρήσει, δεν θέλει ανταγωνισμό, θέλει να τον αποφύγει. Ποιοι πρέπει να είναι υπέρ των μεταρρυθμίσεων; Πρέπει να είναι κυρίως οι νέοι άνθρωποι, οι οποίοι θέλουν μια ανοικτή αγορά που ν’ αρχίσει να λειτουργεί και επιτέλους να μπορούν να βρουν δουλειά. Αλλά το θέμα είναι ότι ακόμα και αυτοί που έχουν το συμφέρον για μια ανοικτή αγορά δεν το καταλαβαίνουν, δεν το γνωρίζουν, διότι είναι τέτοια η παραπληροφόρηση κατά της ανταγωνιστικής αγοράς στην Ελλάδα, από αυτές τις ομάδες (τις οποίες δεν συμφέρει μια ελεύθερη αγορά), που ακόμα και η απαραίτητη πληροφόρηση είναι ελάχιστη.
Περισσότερα
Άκουσε ολόκληρη την συνέντευξη
Διάβασε επίσης
Το συνέδριο του Cato Institute
Voice of America/Φωνή της Αμερικής
23 Οκτωβρίου 2012
O Αριστείδης Χατζής, Αναπληρωτής Καθηγητής Φιλοσοφίας Δικαίου & Θεωρίας Θεσμών του Πανεπιστήμιου Αθηνών συμμετείχε στο Συνέδριο του Ινστιτούτου CΑΤΟ στην Ουάσιγκτον για την κρίση στην Ευρώπη και το κοινωνικό κράτος.
VOA: Καλωσορίσατε στην Ουάσιγκτον. Στην ομιλία σας αναφερθήκατε στην ελληνική κρίση. Ποια νομίζετε ότι μπορεί να είναι μερικά βήματα προς την σωστή κατεύθυνση για την αντιμετώπισή της;
Α. Χατζής: Για μένα το πιο σημαντικό και μοναδικό που δεν έχει γίνει είναι οι μεταρρυθμίσεις. Χωρίς δομικές μεταρρυθμίσεις που θα αλλάξουν τη δομή της ελληνικής κοινωνίας δεν μπορεί να υπάρξει καμία πρόοδος. Και αν υπάρχει μια μεταρρύθμιση, μία, την οποία θα επέλεγα ως την πιο σημαντική, είναι το άνοιγμα της αγοράς. Εδώ υπάρχει ένα πρόβλημα, μία λάθος αντιμετώπιση των ελλήνων και των ελίτ, αλλά και των πολιτών. Από που έρχεται ο πλούτος; Από τα δάνεια; Από τις επιδοτήσεις της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης; Από το κράτος το οποίο θα επενδύσει; Όχι, έρχεται από την αγορά. Πρέπει να υπάρχει μια αγορά που να λειτουργεί. Ε, λοιπόν αυτή η αγορά δεν υπάρχει, γι’ αυτό έχουμε πάνω από ένα εκατομμύριο ανέργους αυτή τη στιγμή στη Ελλάδα, διότι δεν υπάρχει μια ιδιωτική αγορά να τους προσλάβει.
VOA: Υπάρχουν όμως πολλές αντιδράσεις. Πως μπορούν ν’ αντιμετωπιστούν;
Α. Χατζής: Αγορά σημαίνει ανταγωνισμός. Εφόσον λειτουργεί καλά η αγορά και ο ανταγωνισμός είναι σκληρός όλοι θα πρέπει να αποδείξουν σ’ αυτόν του οποίου ζητάνε τα χρήματα ότι του προσφέρουν αυτό το οποίο αναζητά και αξίζει τα χρήματά του. Αυτό είναι δύσκολο. Τον ανταγωνισμό τον μισούν πάρα πολλοί. Κατ’ αρχήν τον μισούν ο επιχειρήσεις. Μια μεγάλη επιχείρηση με ένα μεγάλο μερίδιο στη αγορά θέλει να το διατηρήσει, δεν θέλει ανταγωνισμό, θέλει να τον αποφύγει. Ποιοι πρέπει να είναι υπέρ των μεταρρυθμίσεων; Πρέπει να είναι κυρίως οι νέοι άνθρωποι, οι οποίοι θέλουν μια ανοικτή αγορά που ν’ αρχίσει να λειτουργεί και επιτέλους να μπορούν να βρουν δουλειά. Αλλά το θέμα είναι ότι ακόμα και αυτοί που έχουν το συμφέρον για μια ανοικτή αγορά δεν το καταλαβαίνουν, δεν το γνωρίζουν, διότι είναι τέτοια η παραπληροφόρηση κατά της ανταγωνιστικής αγοράς στην Ελλάδα, από αυτές τις ομάδες (τις οποίες δεν συμφέρει μια ελεύθερη αγορά), που ακόμα και η απαραίτητη πληροφόρηση είναι ελάχιστη.
Περισσότερα
Άκουσε ολόκληρη την συνέντευξη
Διάβασε επίσης
Το συνέδριο του Cato Institute
Monday, October 22, 2012
Θα αλλάξουν και οι πολιτικοί;
του Πάνου Καζάκου
Τα Νέα
22 Οκτωβρίου 2012
Η τρέχουσα αναδιαπραγμάτευση του δεύτερου Μνημονίου (της πολιτικής προσαρμογής) και οι οικονομικές εξελίξεις έδειξαν καθαρά, πρώτον, τις ατέλειες της αρχικής συνταγής. Το ίδιο το Διεθνές Νομισματικό Ταμείο (ΔΝΤ), κάνοντας αυτοκριτική, αναγνώρισε ότι είχε εκτιμήσει λανθασμένα τις επιπτώσεις των μέτρων δημοσιονομικής λιτότητας σε ΑΕΠ (και ανεργία) και στη δημόσια οικονομία. Το λάθος του μοντέλου ήταν στον πολλαπλασιαστή: Δεχόταν δηλαδή ότι 1% μείωση του δημοσιονομικού ελλείμματος δεν οδηγεί σε μείωση του ΑΕΠ κατά 0,5%. Τώρα αναγνωρίζει ότι αυτή η μείωση του ΑΕΠ μπορεί να είναι ...τετραπλάσια! Το λάθος αυτό συμπαρασύρει και άλλα κρίσιμα δημοσιονομικά μεγέθη. Επίσης και συναφώς, το ΔΝΤ υπενθύμισε ότι πρέπει να γίνει νέα περικοπή του ελληνικού δημοσίου χρέους και η προσαρμογή οφείλει να είναι σταδιακή και σε μεγαλύτερο βάθος χρόνου.
Όμως η αναδιαπραγμάτευση ανέδειξε, δεύτερον, τις δυσκολίες των ελλήνων πολιτικών να τηρήσουν δεσμεύσεις που αναλαμβάνουν ιδίως όταν πρόκειται να εφαρμόσουν μεταρρυθμίσεις. Οι υστερήσεις κληροδότησαν τα «89 προαπαιτούμενα» για να εκταμιευθεί η επόμενη δόση, τα οποία πρέπει τώρα να εκπληρωθούν σε απίθανα σύντομο χρονικό διάστημα. Σημειώνω ότι σε αυτά ανήκουν μερικές μεγάλες μεταρρυθμιστικές εκκρεμότητες από τις οποίες εξαρτάται η ανάκαμψη της οικονομίας.
Σίγουρα οι δυσκολίες οφείλονται σε πολλούς παράγοντες όπως η μεγάλη κλίμακα της προσαρμογής που μοιάζει με καθεστωτική αλλαγή, δυσλειτουργικοί θεσμοί που εγείρουν οδοφράγματα, οργανωμένα συμφέροντα που δρουν ως αρνησίκυροι παίκτες, ιδεοληψίες. Οπως διατυπώθηκε προσφυώς, κακοί πολιτικοί θεσμοί συνοδεύονται από κακούς οικονομικούς θεσμούς και ανάλογες συμπεριφορές. Η πολιτική ηγεσία, στην περίπτωση που θέλει μεταρρυθμίσεις, βρίσκει αυτούς τους θεσμούς απέναντί της.
Περισσότερα
Τα Νέα
22 Οκτωβρίου 2012
Η τρέχουσα αναδιαπραγμάτευση του δεύτερου Μνημονίου (της πολιτικής προσαρμογής) και οι οικονομικές εξελίξεις έδειξαν καθαρά, πρώτον, τις ατέλειες της αρχικής συνταγής. Το ίδιο το Διεθνές Νομισματικό Ταμείο (ΔΝΤ), κάνοντας αυτοκριτική, αναγνώρισε ότι είχε εκτιμήσει λανθασμένα τις επιπτώσεις των μέτρων δημοσιονομικής λιτότητας σε ΑΕΠ (και ανεργία) και στη δημόσια οικονομία. Το λάθος του μοντέλου ήταν στον πολλαπλασιαστή: Δεχόταν δηλαδή ότι 1% μείωση του δημοσιονομικού ελλείμματος δεν οδηγεί σε μείωση του ΑΕΠ κατά 0,5%. Τώρα αναγνωρίζει ότι αυτή η μείωση του ΑΕΠ μπορεί να είναι ...τετραπλάσια! Το λάθος αυτό συμπαρασύρει και άλλα κρίσιμα δημοσιονομικά μεγέθη. Επίσης και συναφώς, το ΔΝΤ υπενθύμισε ότι πρέπει να γίνει νέα περικοπή του ελληνικού δημοσίου χρέους και η προσαρμογή οφείλει να είναι σταδιακή και σε μεγαλύτερο βάθος χρόνου.
Όμως η αναδιαπραγμάτευση ανέδειξε, δεύτερον, τις δυσκολίες των ελλήνων πολιτικών να τηρήσουν δεσμεύσεις που αναλαμβάνουν ιδίως όταν πρόκειται να εφαρμόσουν μεταρρυθμίσεις. Οι υστερήσεις κληροδότησαν τα «89 προαπαιτούμενα» για να εκταμιευθεί η επόμενη δόση, τα οποία πρέπει τώρα να εκπληρωθούν σε απίθανα σύντομο χρονικό διάστημα. Σημειώνω ότι σε αυτά ανήκουν μερικές μεγάλες μεταρρυθμιστικές εκκρεμότητες από τις οποίες εξαρτάται η ανάκαμψη της οικονομίας.
Σίγουρα οι δυσκολίες οφείλονται σε πολλούς παράγοντες όπως η μεγάλη κλίμακα της προσαρμογής που μοιάζει με καθεστωτική αλλαγή, δυσλειτουργικοί θεσμοί που εγείρουν οδοφράγματα, οργανωμένα συμφέροντα που δρουν ως αρνησίκυροι παίκτες, ιδεοληψίες. Οπως διατυπώθηκε προσφυώς, κακοί πολιτικοί θεσμοί συνοδεύονται από κακούς οικονομικούς θεσμούς και ανάλογες συμπεριφορές. Η πολιτική ηγεσία, στην περίπτωση που θέλει μεταρρυθμίσεις, βρίσκει αυτούς τους θεσμούς απέναντί της.
Περισσότερα
Greece Austerity Diet Risks 1930s-Style Depression
Bloomberg
October 22, 2012
Greece is spiraling into the kind of decline the U.S. and Germany endured during the Great Depression, showing the scale of the challenge involved in attempting to regain competitiveness through austerity.
The economy shrank 18.4 percent in the past four years and the International Monetary Fund forecasts it will contract another 4 percent in 2013 as Greece struggles to reduce debt in exchange for its $300 billion rescue programs. That’s the biggest cumulative loss of output of a developed-country economy in at least three decades, coming within spitting distance of the 27 percent drop in the U.S. economy between 1929 and 1933, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis in Washington.
“Austerity has been destroying tax revenue and therefore thwarting the intended effect,” said Charles Dumas, chairman of Lombard Street Research, a London-based consulting firm. “There’s no avoiding austerity, though, because these people have no borrowing power. The deficits are there.”
Greece’s restructured bonds have benefited amid speculation that creditors are poised to release more bailout funds. Greek bonds maturing in 2023, which yielded more than 30 percent at the end of May, now yield about 16.4 percent. The next block of aid is slated to total 31 billion euros ($40.5 billion), mostly to recapitalize the nation’s banks.
More
October 22, 2012
Greece is spiraling into the kind of decline the U.S. and Germany endured during the Great Depression, showing the scale of the challenge involved in attempting to regain competitiveness through austerity.
The economy shrank 18.4 percent in the past four years and the International Monetary Fund forecasts it will contract another 4 percent in 2013 as Greece struggles to reduce debt in exchange for its $300 billion rescue programs. That’s the biggest cumulative loss of output of a developed-country economy in at least three decades, coming within spitting distance of the 27 percent drop in the U.S. economy between 1929 and 1933, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis in Washington.
“Austerity has been destroying tax revenue and therefore thwarting the intended effect,” said Charles Dumas, chairman of Lombard Street Research, a London-based consulting firm. “There’s no avoiding austerity, though, because these people have no borrowing power. The deficits are there.”
Greece’s restructured bonds have benefited amid speculation that creditors are poised to release more bailout funds. Greek bonds maturing in 2023, which yielded more than 30 percent at the end of May, now yield about 16.4 percent. The next block of aid is slated to total 31 billion euros ($40.5 billion), mostly to recapitalize the nation’s banks.
More
TARGET losses in case of a euro breakup
by Hans-Werner Sinn
Vox
October 22, 2012
Evaluation of the financial costs of a Eurozone breakup depends critically on the interpretation of the balances central banks hold in the EZ payment system. This column, which replies to the interpretation by De Grauwe and Ji, argues that TARGET balances represent real wealth that would be lost in a breakup.
When exchange rate adjustments are impossible, imbalances of cross-border payment flows must be accommodated officially. This baseline fact about monetary union has sparked extensive discussion on what the resulting asset positions mean (Sinn 2011a,b, Tornell and Westermann 2012, Whelan 2012).
On one side, Sinn and Wollmershäuser (2012) argue that Finland, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, and Germany face the risk of losing the TARGET claims of their national central banks should the euro break up. On the other, De Grauwe and Ji (2012) deny that such a risk exists1. They base this on the grounds that:
I will show that they didn't and that, in fact, all three points of De Grauwe and Ji are erroneous or do not apply to the assessment of TARGET losses in the case of Eurozone breakup. To this end, let me consider the issue in more detail. I will start by reviewing the nature of the TARGET imbalances according to Sinn and Wollmershäuser (2012) and then proceed, in turn, to each of the De Grauwe and Ji (2012) counterarguments. Some of my comments also apply to a new paper by Buiter and Rahbari (2012b) that came out after this note was written. I briefly refer to what I perceive as their error in the section on fiat money.
More
Vox
October 22, 2012
Evaluation of the financial costs of a Eurozone breakup depends critically on the interpretation of the balances central banks hold in the EZ payment system. This column, which replies to the interpretation by De Grauwe and Ji, argues that TARGET balances represent real wealth that would be lost in a breakup.
When exchange rate adjustments are impossible, imbalances of cross-border payment flows must be accommodated officially. This baseline fact about monetary union has sparked extensive discussion on what the resulting asset positions mean (Sinn 2011a,b, Tornell and Westermann 2012, Whelan 2012).
On one side, Sinn and Wollmershäuser (2012) argue that Finland, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, and Germany face the risk of losing the TARGET claims of their national central banks should the euro break up. On the other, De Grauwe and Ji (2012) deny that such a risk exists1. They base this on the grounds that:
- The risk stems only from these countries' self-chosen net foreign asset position;
- Fiat money has a value independent of the corresponding national central bank's assets; and
- Foreign speculators could be excluded from a currency conversion if necessary;
I will show that they didn't and that, in fact, all three points of De Grauwe and Ji are erroneous or do not apply to the assessment of TARGET losses in the case of Eurozone breakup. To this end, let me consider the issue in more detail. I will start by reviewing the nature of the TARGET imbalances according to Sinn and Wollmershäuser (2012) and then proceed, in turn, to each of the De Grauwe and Ji (2012) counterarguments. Some of my comments also apply to a new paper by Buiter and Rahbari (2012b) that came out after this note was written. I briefly refer to what I perceive as their error in the section on fiat money.
More
Saturday, October 20, 2012
Η μείωση της ανεργίας ως εθνικός στόχος
του Μπάμπη Παπαδημητρίου
Καθημερινή
20 Οκτωβρίου 2012
Ευτυχώς, διαπιστώνω, ολοένα και περισσότεροι αντιμετωπίζουν το πρόβλημα της χώρας από την πλευρά της εργασίας. Σκέφτονται, δηλαδή, τρόπους που θα επιτρέψουν στην οικονομία και στην κοινωνία να επιτύχουν σε τρεις στόχους. Στόχοι που συγκλίνουν στην απόλυτη προτεραιότητα που οφείλουμε σε δράσεις οι οποίες θα διασφαλίσουν την τοποθέτηση ανέργων σε θέσεις εργασίας. Μόνον μια εντατική ανάπτυξη του επιχειρηματικού τομέα θα κατορθώσει τη μείωση της ανεργίας.
Πρώτος στόχος είναι να γίνουν λιγότερες απολύσεις στους κλάδους και στα τμήματα της επιχειρηματικότητας, που αντιμετωπίζουν τα μεγαλύτερα προβλήματα προσαρμογής. Είχαμε, για παράδειγμα, μεγάλη μείωση θέσεων εργασίας επειδή συνεχίστηκε η μακρά διολίσθηση στην ανταγωνιστικότητα στην κατασκευή ενδυμάτων, επίπλων, μηχανών, ακόμη και δομικών υλικών. Το εμπόριο υποκατέστησε εγχωρίως μεταποιούμενα προϊόντα. Η πτώση της ζήτησης απογύμνωσε το ήδη συντελεσθέν γεγονός, αφού η πτώση του εμπορίου παρέσυρε ολόκληρους κλάδους οι οποίοι συνδύαζαν το εισαγωγικό εμπόριο με την εναπομείνασα εγχώρια παραγωγή.
Χειρότερα είναι τα πράγματα στο μικρό εμπόριο. Πολλές μικρές εμπορικές επιχειρήσεις κλείνουν επειδή ο καταναλωτής δεν μπορεί να υποστηρίξει τα περιθώρια κέρδους που συντηρούσαν πολλές δεκάδες χιλιάδες θέσεις εργασίας. Οι οικογενειακές επιχειρήσεις επιστρέφουν στο σημείο από το οποίο ξεκίνησαν, απολύουν όμως τους υπαλλήλους, εξέλιξη που περιορίζει δραστικά την κερδοφορία τους.
Περισσότερα
Καθημερινή
20 Οκτωβρίου 2012
Ευτυχώς, διαπιστώνω, ολοένα και περισσότεροι αντιμετωπίζουν το πρόβλημα της χώρας από την πλευρά της εργασίας. Σκέφτονται, δηλαδή, τρόπους που θα επιτρέψουν στην οικονομία και στην κοινωνία να επιτύχουν σε τρεις στόχους. Στόχοι που συγκλίνουν στην απόλυτη προτεραιότητα που οφείλουμε σε δράσεις οι οποίες θα διασφαλίσουν την τοποθέτηση ανέργων σε θέσεις εργασίας. Μόνον μια εντατική ανάπτυξη του επιχειρηματικού τομέα θα κατορθώσει τη μείωση της ανεργίας.
Πρώτος στόχος είναι να γίνουν λιγότερες απολύσεις στους κλάδους και στα τμήματα της επιχειρηματικότητας, που αντιμετωπίζουν τα μεγαλύτερα προβλήματα προσαρμογής. Είχαμε, για παράδειγμα, μεγάλη μείωση θέσεων εργασίας επειδή συνεχίστηκε η μακρά διολίσθηση στην ανταγωνιστικότητα στην κατασκευή ενδυμάτων, επίπλων, μηχανών, ακόμη και δομικών υλικών. Το εμπόριο υποκατέστησε εγχωρίως μεταποιούμενα προϊόντα. Η πτώση της ζήτησης απογύμνωσε το ήδη συντελεσθέν γεγονός, αφού η πτώση του εμπορίου παρέσυρε ολόκληρους κλάδους οι οποίοι συνδύαζαν το εισαγωγικό εμπόριο με την εναπομείνασα εγχώρια παραγωγή.
Χειρότερα είναι τα πράγματα στο μικρό εμπόριο. Πολλές μικρές εμπορικές επιχειρήσεις κλείνουν επειδή ο καταναλωτής δεν μπορεί να υποστηρίξει τα περιθώρια κέρδους που συντηρούσαν πολλές δεκάδες χιλιάδες θέσεις εργασίας. Οι οικογενειακές επιχειρήσεις επιστρέφουν στο σημείο από το οποίο ξεκίνησαν, απολύουν όμως τους υπαλλήλους, εξέλιξη που περιορίζει δραστικά την κερδοφορία τους.
Περισσότερα
Thursday, October 18, 2012
Europe’s Flawed Banking Union
by Howard Davies
Project Syndicate
October 18, 2012
The European Union is now the proud owner of a Nobel Peace Prize. When the choice alighted on Barack Obama three years ago, the Norwegian Nobel Committee was criticized for honoring someone whose achievements were still to come. The Committee took that criticism to heart, and this time decorated an institution with a proud past, but a clouded future.
The eurozone is distinct from the EU of course, but it is the Union’s most ambitious undertaking to date, and it is still struggling to equip itself with the structures needed to bolster a currency union. A common fiscal policy remains a distant dream, as does a genuine political union.
But Europe’s policymakers claim to be making progress toward a so-called “banking union,” which means collective banking supervision, rather than a merger of banks themselves. In September, the European Commission announced a plan to make the European Central Bank the supervisor of all 6,000 of Europe’s banks.
More
Project Syndicate
October 18, 2012
The European Union is now the proud owner of a Nobel Peace Prize. When the choice alighted on Barack Obama three years ago, the Norwegian Nobel Committee was criticized for honoring someone whose achievements were still to come. The Committee took that criticism to heart, and this time decorated an institution with a proud past, but a clouded future.
The eurozone is distinct from the EU of course, but it is the Union’s most ambitious undertaking to date, and it is still struggling to equip itself with the structures needed to bolster a currency union. A common fiscal policy remains a distant dream, as does a genuine political union.
But Europe’s policymakers claim to be making progress toward a so-called “banking union,” which means collective banking supervision, rather than a merger of banks themselves. In September, the European Commission announced a plan to make the European Central Bank the supervisor of all 6,000 of Europe’s banks.
More
Greece must stop hitting snooze and wake up to economic reform
by Matthew Melchiorre
City A.M.
October 18, 2012
When the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and European finance ministers meet today at the European Union (EU) summit, they are bound to butt heads over the decision to release Greece’s next €31.5bn bailout installment.
The prospect of default may be a possibility once again. European leaders and international lenders will likely come to an eleventh-hour agreement, but it may not be a bad idea to keep Greek politicians wondering in the interim.
Greece has become complacent about making necessary structural changes, having received two bailouts, interest rate support from the European Central Bank (ECB), and an internationally sanctioned private debt restructuring earlier this year. It has failed to reform its public sector, privatise state-owned companies, increase competitiveness — all conditions for receiving additional international support. The resurgent spectre of default would send a strong message to Greek politicians that their cowardly approach to reform is both unacceptable to creditors and unsustainable for Greece’s balance sheet in the long-run.
Greece’s public sector is as bloated now as it was upon agreement to its first bailout in May 2010. Public expenditure as a percentage of GDP remains at a whopping 51 per cent, according to IMF figures. Some European countries do have a higher proportion, but without Greece’s abysmal level of government inefficiency.
More
City A.M.
October 18, 2012
When the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and European finance ministers meet today at the European Union (EU) summit, they are bound to butt heads over the decision to release Greece’s next €31.5bn bailout installment.
The prospect of default may be a possibility once again. European leaders and international lenders will likely come to an eleventh-hour agreement, but it may not be a bad idea to keep Greek politicians wondering in the interim.
Greece has become complacent about making necessary structural changes, having received two bailouts, interest rate support from the European Central Bank (ECB), and an internationally sanctioned private debt restructuring earlier this year. It has failed to reform its public sector, privatise state-owned companies, increase competitiveness — all conditions for receiving additional international support. The resurgent spectre of default would send a strong message to Greek politicians that their cowardly approach to reform is both unacceptable to creditors and unsustainable for Greece’s balance sheet in the long-run.
Greece’s public sector is as bloated now as it was upon agreement to its first bailout in May 2010. Public expenditure as a percentage of GDP remains at a whopping 51 per cent, according to IMF figures. Some European countries do have a higher proportion, but without Greece’s abysmal level of government inefficiency.
More
Wednesday, October 17, 2012
Europe banking supervisor plan ‘illegal’
Financial Times
October 17, 2012
A plan to create a single eurozone banking supervisor is illegal, according to a secret legal opinion for EU finance ministers that deals a further blow to a reform deemed vital to solving the bloc’s debt crisis.
A paper from the EU Council’s top legal adviser, obtained by the Financial Times, argues the plan goes “beyond the powers” permitted under law to change governance rules at the European Central Bank.
The legal service concludes that without altering EU treaties it would be impossible to give a bank supervision board within the ECB any formal decision-making powers as suggested in the blueprint drawn up by the European Commission.
Those non-eurozone countries that want to opt into the bank supervision regime would also be legally unable to vote on any ECB decisions – a key demand of countries such as Sweden and Poland.
While it is common for lawyers from different EU institutions to disagree on aspects of proposals, diplomats involved in the talks said the sharp difference in legal opinion would complicate efforts to overcome the deep-set concerns of some member states. Banking union will be a central topic at the EU leaders summit on Thursday.
More
October 17, 2012
A plan to create a single eurozone banking supervisor is illegal, according to a secret legal opinion for EU finance ministers that deals a further blow to a reform deemed vital to solving the bloc’s debt crisis.
A paper from the EU Council’s top legal adviser, obtained by the Financial Times, argues the plan goes “beyond the powers” permitted under law to change governance rules at the European Central Bank.
The legal service concludes that without altering EU treaties it would be impossible to give a bank supervision board within the ECB any formal decision-making powers as suggested in the blueprint drawn up by the European Commission.
Those non-eurozone countries that want to opt into the bank supervision regime would also be legally unable to vote on any ECB decisions – a key demand of countries such as Sweden and Poland.
While it is common for lawyers from different EU institutions to disagree on aspects of proposals, diplomats involved in the talks said the sharp difference in legal opinion would complicate efforts to overcome the deep-set concerns of some member states. Banking union will be a central topic at the EU leaders summit on Thursday.
More
Statement by the EC, ECB and IMF on Greece
International Monetary Fund
Press Release No. 12/395
October 17, 2012
“Staff teams of the European Commission (EC), the European Central Bank (ECB), and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) have concluded their visit to Greece to discuss with the authorities the set of policies that could serve as a basis for the completion of the first review of the country’s economic adjustment program.
“During the visit, the EC/ECB/IMF staff teams and the authorities had comprehensive and productive discussions on the policies needed to restore growth, employment and competitiveness, secure fiscal sustainability in a socially balanced manner, and strengthen the financial system.
“The authorities and staff teams agreed on most of the core measures needed to restore the momentum of reform and pave the way for the completion of the review. Discussions on remaining issues will continue from respective headquarters and through technical representatives in the field with a view to reaching full staff level agreement over the coming days. Furthermore, financing issues will be discussed between the official lenders and Greece.”
More
Press Release No. 12/395
October 17, 2012
“Staff teams of the European Commission (EC), the European Central Bank (ECB), and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) have concluded their visit to Greece to discuss with the authorities the set of policies that could serve as a basis for the completion of the first review of the country’s economic adjustment program.
“During the visit, the EC/ECB/IMF staff teams and the authorities had comprehensive and productive discussions on the policies needed to restore growth, employment and competitiveness, secure fiscal sustainability in a socially balanced manner, and strengthen the financial system.
“The authorities and staff teams agreed on most of the core measures needed to restore the momentum of reform and pave the way for the completion of the review. Discussions on remaining issues will continue from respective headquarters and through technical representatives in the field with a view to reaching full staff level agreement over the coming days. Furthermore, financing issues will be discussed between the official lenders and Greece.”
More
Alarm at Greek police 'collusion' with far-right Golden Dawn
by Paul Mason
BBC News
October 17, 2012
Greece's far-right party, Golden Dawn, won 18 parliamentary seats in the June election with a campaign openly hostile to illegal immigrants and there are now allegations that some Greek police are supporting the party.
"There is already civil war," says Ilias Panagiotaros. If so, the shop he owns is set to do a roaring trade.
It sells camouflage gear, police riot gloves, face masks and T-shirts extolling football hooliganism.
On the walls are posters celebrating the last civil war in Greece, which ended in 1949.
"Greek society is ready - even though no-one likes this - to have a fight: a new type of civil war," he says.
"On the one side there will be nationalists like us, and Greeks who want our country to be as it used to be, and on the other side illegal immigrants, anarchists and all those who have destroyed Athens several times," he adds.
You hear comments like this a lot in Greece now but Ilias Panagiotaros is not some figure on the fringes: he is a member of the Greek parliament, one of 18 MPs elected for the far-right Golden Dawn in June's general election.
More
BBC News
October 17, 2012
Greece's far-right party, Golden Dawn, won 18 parliamentary seats in the June election with a campaign openly hostile to illegal immigrants and there are now allegations that some Greek police are supporting the party.
"There is already civil war," says Ilias Panagiotaros. If so, the shop he owns is set to do a roaring trade.
It sells camouflage gear, police riot gloves, face masks and T-shirts extolling football hooliganism.
On the walls are posters celebrating the last civil war in Greece, which ended in 1949.
"Greek society is ready - even though no-one likes this - to have a fight: a new type of civil war," he says.
"On the one side there will be nationalists like us, and Greeks who want our country to be as it used to be, and on the other side illegal immigrants, anarchists and all those who have destroyed Athens several times," he adds.
You hear comments like this a lot in Greece now but Ilias Panagiotaros is not some figure on the fringes: he is a member of the Greek parliament, one of 18 MPs elected for the far-right Golden Dawn in June's general election.
More
The IMF has not rejected austerity
by Lorenzo Bini Smaghi
Financial Times
October 17, 2012
The World Economic Outlook published by the International Monetary Fund last week has created new excitement around the debate on the effectiveness of fiscal retrenchment. The evidence that governments have consistently been underestimating the size of the fiscal multiplier – which measures the impact of deficit reduction measures on economic growth – has been used to suggest that austerity policies are doomed to fail.
That is the wrong conclusion to draw from the IMF study.
The fiscal multiplier quantifies the impact of a given change in taxes or public expenditures on gross domestic product (GDP). Those who interpreted the IMF study as evidence that austerity is self-defeating mistakenly believe the multiplier measures the impact of a change in the budget deficit on the long-term rate of growth of the economy. In fact the multiplier measures the one-off impact of budget changes on output when the adjustment is made.
Let us consider a simple example of a country with a budget deficit of 1 per cent of GDP, a debt to GDP ratio of 100 per cent and a trend growth rate of 1 per cent per year. A multiplier lower than one implies that when the deficit is reduced from 1 per cent to zero, GDP continues to rise – although temporarily at a lower rate than the trend – and the debt falls as a percentage of GDP.
More
Financial Times
October 17, 2012
The World Economic Outlook published by the International Monetary Fund last week has created new excitement around the debate on the effectiveness of fiscal retrenchment. The evidence that governments have consistently been underestimating the size of the fiscal multiplier – which measures the impact of deficit reduction measures on economic growth – has been used to suggest that austerity policies are doomed to fail.
That is the wrong conclusion to draw from the IMF study.
The fiscal multiplier quantifies the impact of a given change in taxes or public expenditures on gross domestic product (GDP). Those who interpreted the IMF study as evidence that austerity is self-defeating mistakenly believe the multiplier measures the impact of a change in the budget deficit on the long-term rate of growth of the economy. In fact the multiplier measures the one-off impact of budget changes on output when the adjustment is made.
Let us consider a simple example of a country with a budget deficit of 1 per cent of GDP, a debt to GDP ratio of 100 per cent and a trend growth rate of 1 per cent per year. A multiplier lower than one implies that when the deficit is reduced from 1 per cent to zero, GDP continues to rise – although temporarily at a lower rate than the trend – and the debt falls as a percentage of GDP.
More
Here’s Why Europe Must Do More to Save Its Currency Union
Bloomberg
Editorial
October 17, 2012
The battle to save the euro turns on one question: Can large governments, notably Italy and Spain, get their debts under control?
Because they are in a monetary union, they can’t take the easy way out by devaluing their currencies to make their obligations smaller and exports cheaper relative to those of other countries. Instead, they have to make painful budget cuts and slash workers’ wages to restore their competitiveness -- moves that, in the short term, can make their debts less manageable by eroding economic growth. If the belt-tightening proves too much to bear, or if markets lose faith in their ability to succeed, the euro area will break apart.
As Europe’s leaders meet for their two-day summit in Brussels this week, they can take credit for considerable progress in containing market panic and demonstrating their commitment to the currency. They have pledged to share responsibility for overseeing and shoring up euro-area banks, potentially relieving struggling governments of a big liability. More important, the European Central Bank has promised unlimited support to keep countries’ borrowing costs in check, as long as they act in a fiscally responsible manner.
So how much has all the activity achieved? To get a better picture, we built a model to assess the solvency of euro-area governments.
More
See also
Editorial
October 17, 2012
The battle to save the euro turns on one question: Can large governments, notably Italy and Spain, get their debts under control?
Because they are in a monetary union, they can’t take the easy way out by devaluing their currencies to make their obligations smaller and exports cheaper relative to those of other countries. Instead, they have to make painful budget cuts and slash workers’ wages to restore their competitiveness -- moves that, in the short term, can make their debts less manageable by eroding economic growth. If the belt-tightening proves too much to bear, or if markets lose faith in their ability to succeed, the euro area will break apart.
As Europe’s leaders meet for their two-day summit in Brussels this week, they can take credit for considerable progress in containing market panic and demonstrating their commitment to the currency. They have pledged to share responsibility for overseeing and shoring up euro-area banks, potentially relieving struggling governments of a big liability. More important, the European Central Bank has promised unlimited support to keep countries’ borrowing costs in check, as long as they act in a fiscally responsible manner.
So how much has all the activity achieved? To get a better picture, we built a model to assess the solvency of euro-area governments.
More
See also
Τα τελευταία δυόμισι χρόνια έβαλαν λουκέτο 100.000 επιχειρήσεις
in.gr
17 Οκτωβρίου 2012
Η πολιτική εσωτερικής υποτίμησης έχει οδηγήσει σε διακοπή εργασιών 100.000 επιχειρήσεις τα τελευταία 2½ χρόνια, με αποτέλεσμα να χαθούν περί τις 500.000 θέσεις εργασίας, επισημαίνει η ΓΣΕΒΕΕ.
Ο ιδιωτικός τομέας και ιδιαίτερα οι μικρές επιχειρήσεις έχουν «γονατίσει», τονίζει και με επιστολή της ζητά άμεση συνάντηση με τον πρωθυπουργό και τους πολιτικούς αρχηγούς των κομμάτων.
Τα νούμερα από τη Eurostat δείχνουν ότι ο φαύλος κύκλος της ύφεσης απειλεί τις αντοχές της κοινωνίας, τη βιωσιμότητα των επιχειρήσεων και οδηγεί σε μαζική καταστροφή θέσεων εργασίας, δεν επιτρέπει κυβερνητικούς και κομματικούς απομονωτισμούς και μονομερείς αποφάσεις, σημειώνει στη σχετική επιστολή προς τον πρωθυπουργό και τους αρχηγούς των πολιτικών κομμάτων.
Όπως επισημαίνει η ΓΣΕΒΕΕ: «η πολιτική της εσωτερικής υποτίμησης, σύμφωνα και με τα στοιχεία του ΙΜΕ ΓΣΕΒΕΕ, έχει οδηγήσει σε διακοπή εργασιών 100.000 επιχειρήσεις (καθαρή μείωση) τα τελευταία 2½ χρόνια. Στοιχεία που επιβεβαιώνονται και από την Eurostat.»
» Σε ό,τι αφορά δε τις θέσεις απασχόλησης, χάθηκαν περί τις 500.000 από το 2010 έως σήμερα στον ιδιωτικό τομέα με αποτέλεσμα η οικονομική κρίση να τείνει να μετατραπεί και σε έντονα ανθρωπιστική».
«Ο ιδιωτικός τομέας και ιδιαίτερα οι μικρές επιχειρήσεις έχουν 'γονατίσει'» τονίζει.
Περισσότερα
17 Οκτωβρίου 2012
Η πολιτική εσωτερικής υποτίμησης έχει οδηγήσει σε διακοπή εργασιών 100.000 επιχειρήσεις τα τελευταία 2½ χρόνια, με αποτέλεσμα να χαθούν περί τις 500.000 θέσεις εργασίας, επισημαίνει η ΓΣΕΒΕΕ.
Ο ιδιωτικός τομέας και ιδιαίτερα οι μικρές επιχειρήσεις έχουν «γονατίσει», τονίζει και με επιστολή της ζητά άμεση συνάντηση με τον πρωθυπουργό και τους πολιτικούς αρχηγούς των κομμάτων.
Τα νούμερα από τη Eurostat δείχνουν ότι ο φαύλος κύκλος της ύφεσης απειλεί τις αντοχές της κοινωνίας, τη βιωσιμότητα των επιχειρήσεων και οδηγεί σε μαζική καταστροφή θέσεων εργασίας, δεν επιτρέπει κυβερνητικούς και κομματικούς απομονωτισμούς και μονομερείς αποφάσεις, σημειώνει στη σχετική επιστολή προς τον πρωθυπουργό και τους αρχηγούς των πολιτικών κομμάτων.
Όπως επισημαίνει η ΓΣΕΒΕΕ: «η πολιτική της εσωτερικής υποτίμησης, σύμφωνα και με τα στοιχεία του ΙΜΕ ΓΣΕΒΕΕ, έχει οδηγήσει σε διακοπή εργασιών 100.000 επιχειρήσεις (καθαρή μείωση) τα τελευταία 2½ χρόνια. Στοιχεία που επιβεβαιώνονται και από την Eurostat.»
» Σε ό,τι αφορά δε τις θέσεις απασχόλησης, χάθηκαν περί τις 500.000 από το 2010 έως σήμερα στον ιδιωτικό τομέα με αποτέλεσμα η οικονομική κρίση να τείνει να μετατραπεί και σε έντονα ανθρωπιστική».
«Ο ιδιωτικός τομέας και ιδιαίτερα οι μικρές επιχειρήσεις έχουν 'γονατίσει'» τονίζει.
Περισσότερα
Tuesday, October 16, 2012
The fund warns and encourages
by Martin Wolf
Financial Times
October 16, 2012
In its relations with its most powerful clients, the International Monetary Fund possesses “the right to be consulted, the right to encourage and the right to warn”. Walter Bagehot, the great Victorian economic journalist, gave this description of the role of the British monarch in the 19th century. I applied this phrase to the role of the fund in a paper I submitted to its 2011 triennial surveillance review. At the annual meetings in Tokyo, the fund fulfilled precisely this role. What matters, however, is that its members, above all, the US and Germany, act upon the warnings and encouragement they have received.
The warning provided by the IMF’s World Economic Outlook was that: “The recovery continues, but it has weakened. In advanced countries, growth is now too low to make a substantial dent in unemployment. And in major emerging market economies, growth that had been strong earlier has also decreased.” The IMF revised its forecast for 2013 growth in advanced economies from the 2.0 per cent it forecast in April to 1.5 per cent. For developing countries, it cut its forecast from April’s prediction of 6.0 per cent to 5.6 per cent. The performance of the US, with forecast growth of 2.1 per cent next year (just 0.1 percentage points lower than forecast in July), is expected to be far better than that of the eurozone, where growth is forecast at 0.2 per cent next year (0.5 percentage points lower than forecast in July), after -0.4 per cent in 2012. Even Germany’s economy is forecast to grow by a mere 0.9 per cent in 2012 and 2013. Spain’s is forecast to shrink by 1.5 per cent and then 1.3 per cent. The eurozone is a cage for masochists.
It is no secret why growth is slowing in high-income countries: this is due to fiscal tightening, weak financial systems and powerful uncertainty. This toxic combination is particularly threatening inside the eurozone, where, again no surprise, countries reliant on exports are affected by the shrinking economies of big trading partners. As the latest Global Financial Stability Report shows, cumulative capital flight from peripheral eurozone economies is more than 10 per cent of gross domestic product. Indeed, without support, principally from the European Central Bank, peripheral economies would have had to impose exchange controls. They might even have left the eurozone. The fear of break-up remains pervasive: it is always hard to make masochism a credible strategy. (See charts.)
So far, so bad. But even these depressing forecasts make two possibly optimistic assumptions. The first is that the US avoids the “fiscal cliff” created by its quarrelling legislators. If not avoided, this would impose a tightening of 4 per cent of GDP. Sane people know the result: a deep recession and, possibly, outright deflation. Can US legislators be that stupid? One must assume not. The second optimistic assumption is that “European policy makers take additional action to advance adjustment at national levels and integration at the euro area level. As a result, policy credibility and confidence improve gradually.” Will European policy makers be that effective? One wonders, even if they have been more decisive recently.
More
Financial Times
October 16, 2012
In its relations with its most powerful clients, the International Monetary Fund possesses “the right to be consulted, the right to encourage and the right to warn”. Walter Bagehot, the great Victorian economic journalist, gave this description of the role of the British monarch in the 19th century. I applied this phrase to the role of the fund in a paper I submitted to its 2011 triennial surveillance review. At the annual meetings in Tokyo, the fund fulfilled precisely this role. What matters, however, is that its members, above all, the US and Germany, act upon the warnings and encouragement they have received.
The warning provided by the IMF’s World Economic Outlook was that: “The recovery continues, but it has weakened. In advanced countries, growth is now too low to make a substantial dent in unemployment. And in major emerging market economies, growth that had been strong earlier has also decreased.” The IMF revised its forecast for 2013 growth in advanced economies from the 2.0 per cent it forecast in April to 1.5 per cent. For developing countries, it cut its forecast from April’s prediction of 6.0 per cent to 5.6 per cent. The performance of the US, with forecast growth of 2.1 per cent next year (just 0.1 percentage points lower than forecast in July), is expected to be far better than that of the eurozone, where growth is forecast at 0.2 per cent next year (0.5 percentage points lower than forecast in July), after -0.4 per cent in 2012. Even Germany’s economy is forecast to grow by a mere 0.9 per cent in 2012 and 2013. Spain’s is forecast to shrink by 1.5 per cent and then 1.3 per cent. The eurozone is a cage for masochists.
It is no secret why growth is slowing in high-income countries: this is due to fiscal tightening, weak financial systems and powerful uncertainty. This toxic combination is particularly threatening inside the eurozone, where, again no surprise, countries reliant on exports are affected by the shrinking economies of big trading partners. As the latest Global Financial Stability Report shows, cumulative capital flight from peripheral eurozone economies is more than 10 per cent of gross domestic product. Indeed, without support, principally from the European Central Bank, peripheral economies would have had to impose exchange controls. They might even have left the eurozone. The fear of break-up remains pervasive: it is always hard to make masochism a credible strategy. (See charts.)
So far, so bad. But even these depressing forecasts make two possibly optimistic assumptions. The first is that the US avoids the “fiscal cliff” created by its quarrelling legislators. If not avoided, this would impose a tightening of 4 per cent of GDP. Sane people know the result: a deep recession and, possibly, outright deflation. Can US legislators be that stupid? One must assume not. The second optimistic assumption is that “European policy makers take additional action to advance adjustment at national levels and integration at the euro area level. As a result, policy credibility and confidence improve gradually.” Will European policy makers be that effective? One wonders, even if they have been more decisive recently.
More
Corruption Continues Virtually Unchecked in Greece
Spiegel
October 16, 2012
While Athens waits for more aid from the European Union, the country continues to be administered in the same old careless manner. Corrupt politicians and the rich continue to help themselves to Greece's funds, and little is being done about it.
How can someone who has declared an annual income of €25,000 ($32,400) transfer €52 million abroad? What kind of supplementary income must an individual have who, according to his tax returns, earned €5,588 in 2010, yet still managed to move €19.8 million abroad? And how can it be that a Greek citizen sequesters €9.7 million abroad although he supposedly earned exactly zero euros?
These are the questions that tax fraud investigators will have to ask of a number of individuals whose identity has so far only been made public in the form of initials. For instance, a "G. D." stands at the top of a list with the names of 54,000 Greek citizens who relocated major assets abroad between 2009 and 2011. The list stems from the Greek central bank and is now in the hands of the Finance Ministry.
It is the longest of four lists that are currently circulating in Athens. Each contains the names of people whose financial circumstances -- bank balances and real estate holdings -- do not correspond at all with what they claimed on their tax returns. But hardly anything is being done about it. The Greek reality is sometimes paradoxical: While the governing coalition was busy squabbling with international creditors over how many hundreds of euros can still be trimmed from teachers' and nurses' paychecks, and Athens continued slashing employee pensions, wealthy Greeks moved billions abroad with relative impunity.
The odyssey of the "Lagarde list," as it's known, exemplifies the typically lax attitude toward tax criminals. For many months, it was thought to be lost, but then it resurfaced in early October. Now, the public prosecutor for financial crimes has a copy. It lists 1,991 Greek owners of Swiss bank accounts, and reportedly includes many prominent individuals from the realms of politics, business and culture.
More
October 16, 2012
While Athens waits for more aid from the European Union, the country continues to be administered in the same old careless manner. Corrupt politicians and the rich continue to help themselves to Greece's funds, and little is being done about it.
How can someone who has declared an annual income of €25,000 ($32,400) transfer €52 million abroad? What kind of supplementary income must an individual have who, according to his tax returns, earned €5,588 in 2010, yet still managed to move €19.8 million abroad? And how can it be that a Greek citizen sequesters €9.7 million abroad although he supposedly earned exactly zero euros?
These are the questions that tax fraud investigators will have to ask of a number of individuals whose identity has so far only been made public in the form of initials. For instance, a "G. D." stands at the top of a list with the names of 54,000 Greek citizens who relocated major assets abroad between 2009 and 2011. The list stems from the Greek central bank and is now in the hands of the Finance Ministry.
It is the longest of four lists that are currently circulating in Athens. Each contains the names of people whose financial circumstances -- bank balances and real estate holdings -- do not correspond at all with what they claimed on their tax returns. But hardly anything is being done about it. The Greek reality is sometimes paradoxical: While the governing coalition was busy squabbling with international creditors over how many hundreds of euros can still be trimmed from teachers' and nurses' paychecks, and Athens continued slashing employee pensions, wealthy Greeks moved billions abroad with relative impunity.
The odyssey of the "Lagarde list," as it's known, exemplifies the typically lax attitude toward tax criminals. For many months, it was thought to be lost, but then it resurfaced in early October. Now, the public prosecutor for financial crimes has a copy. It lists 1,991 Greek owners of Swiss bank accounts, and reportedly includes many prominent individuals from the realms of politics, business and culture.
More
Σταθερός ο πληθωρισμός στην Ευρωζώνη το Σεπτέμβριο
Καθημερινή
16 Οκτωβρίου 2012
Σταθερός στο 2,6% σε ετήσια βάση παρέμεινε ο πληθωρισμός το Σεπτέμβριο στην Ευρωζώνη ανακοίνωσε η Ευρωπαϊκή Στατιστική Υπηρεσία. Το Σεπτέμβριο του 2011 ο πληθωρισμός στην Ευρωζώνη ήταν στο 3%. Στο σύνολο της Ε.Ε. ο πληθωρισμός παρέμεινε στο 2,7%, αμετάβλητος σε σχέση με τον Αύγουστο. Αναλυτικότερα, σε ετήσια βάση ο χαμηλότερος ρυθμός πληθωρισμού το Σεπτέμβριο καταγράφεται στην Ελλάδα (0,3%), τη Σουηδία (1,0%) και τη Λετονία (1,9%). Αντιθέτως τα υψηλότερα ποσοστά καταγράφονται στην Ουγγαρία (6,4%), τη Ρουμανία (5,4%) και την Εσθονία (4,1%). Αν εξετάσουμε το μέσο όρο του πληθωρισμού το τελευταίο δωδεκάμηνο οι χαμηλότεροι ρυθμοί καταγράφονται στη Σουηδία (0,9%), την Ελλάδα (1,6%) και στην Ιρλανδία (1,9%). Στη Γερμανία ο μέσος όρος του πληθωρισμού το τελευταίο έτος είναι 2,3%, ενώ στο σύνολο της Ευρωζώνης 2,7% και στο σύνολο της Ε.Ε. 2,8%.
Περισσότερα
16 Οκτωβρίου 2012
Σταθερός στο 2,6% σε ετήσια βάση παρέμεινε ο πληθωρισμός το Σεπτέμβριο στην Ευρωζώνη ανακοίνωσε η Ευρωπαϊκή Στατιστική Υπηρεσία. Το Σεπτέμβριο του 2011 ο πληθωρισμός στην Ευρωζώνη ήταν στο 3%. Στο σύνολο της Ε.Ε. ο πληθωρισμός παρέμεινε στο 2,7%, αμετάβλητος σε σχέση με τον Αύγουστο. Αναλυτικότερα, σε ετήσια βάση ο χαμηλότερος ρυθμός πληθωρισμού το Σεπτέμβριο καταγράφεται στην Ελλάδα (0,3%), τη Σουηδία (1,0%) και τη Λετονία (1,9%). Αντιθέτως τα υψηλότερα ποσοστά καταγράφονται στην Ουγγαρία (6,4%), τη Ρουμανία (5,4%) και την Εσθονία (4,1%). Αν εξετάσουμε το μέσο όρο του πληθωρισμού το τελευταίο δωδεκάμηνο οι χαμηλότεροι ρυθμοί καταγράφονται στη Σουηδία (0,9%), την Ελλάδα (1,6%) και στην Ιρλανδία (1,9%). Στη Γερμανία ο μέσος όρος του πληθωρισμού το τελευταίο έτος είναι 2,3%, ενώ στο σύνολο της Ευρωζώνης 2,7% και στο σύνολο της Ε.Ε. 2,8%.
Περισσότερα
Bank Supervision: A Lot Like Love?
by Matina Stevis
Wall Street Journal
October 16, 2012
Covering the euro-zone crisis is often surreal. But seldom as much as when you hear a senior official liken banking supervision to love. But let’s take things from the start.
Much of the debate behind closed doors in Brussels and Frankfurt these days is about the single banking supervisor — an agency of/under the European Central Bank that will police the currency bloc’s banks. The details of this first step towards a banking union are being negotiated right now, but one thing that makes it interesting is that its creation and effective operation is a prerequisite for the euro-zone bailout fund to rescue banks directly.
The key word here is “effective.” It’s not enough for this new institution to be designed, legislated, set up. It needs, euro-zone leaders agreed back in June, to be effective. That’s so the bailout fund–the European Stability Mechanism–can trust that the banks it’s saving don’t blow up in its face or on its balance sheet.
More
Wall Street Journal
October 16, 2012
Covering the euro-zone crisis is often surreal. But seldom as much as when you hear a senior official liken banking supervision to love. But let’s take things from the start.
Much of the debate behind closed doors in Brussels and Frankfurt these days is about the single banking supervisor — an agency of/under the European Central Bank that will police the currency bloc’s banks. The details of this first step towards a banking union are being negotiated right now, but one thing that makes it interesting is that its creation and effective operation is a prerequisite for the euro-zone bailout fund to rescue banks directly.
The key word here is “effective.” It’s not enough for this new institution to be designed, legislated, set up. It needs, euro-zone leaders agreed back in June, to be effective. That’s so the bailout fund–the European Stability Mechanism–can trust that the banks it’s saving don’t blow up in its face or on its balance sheet.
More
Monday, October 15, 2012
EU Leaders to Focus on Euro-Zone Reform
Wall Street Journal
October 15, 2012
European leaders will devote another summit to discussing the future of the euro area later this week, with a view to exploring options such as a euro-zone budget and contracts committing countries to economic reforms, a senior European Union official said Monday.
The 27 EU heads of state are due to meet in Brussels on Thursday for a planned two-day summit. A draft of their conclusions obtained by Dow Jones Newswires shows that they are set to stress their devotion to restoring growth and jobs in the economically challenged bloc.
But the centerpiece of the summit is set to be a report by European Council President Herman Van Rompuy on the future architecture of Economic and Monetary Union, the EU official said, otherwise describing it as a "run-of-the-mill" meeting.
Mr. Van Rompuy's bolder proposals will be up for debate, the official said, adding that the European leader will seek "an exploratory mandate" to get into the nitty-gritty of the common budget and the contracts options and present more details on them at the next leaders' summit in December.
More
October 15, 2012
European leaders will devote another summit to discussing the future of the euro area later this week, with a view to exploring options such as a euro-zone budget and contracts committing countries to economic reforms, a senior European Union official said Monday.
The 27 EU heads of state are due to meet in Brussels on Thursday for a planned two-day summit. A draft of their conclusions obtained by Dow Jones Newswires shows that they are set to stress their devotion to restoring growth and jobs in the economically challenged bloc.
But the centerpiece of the summit is set to be a report by European Council President Herman Van Rompuy on the future architecture of Economic and Monetary Union, the EU official said, otherwise describing it as a "run-of-the-mill" meeting.
Mr. Van Rompuy's bolder proposals will be up for debate, the official said, adding that the European leader will seek "an exploratory mandate" to get into the nitty-gritty of the common budget and the contracts options and present more details on them at the next leaders' summit in December.
More
Bad Advice for the Greeks
by Patrick Barron
Mises News
October 15, 2012
This summer Roger Bootle won Lord Wolfson's £250,000 prize for the best advice for a country leaving the European Monetary Union (one may assume that this advice is aimed at Greece). A more statist, anti-liberal policy than his could hardly be envisioned, which is a sad commentary on the mindset of the judges chosen by Lord Wolfson. His advice contrasted sharply with that of Dr. Philipp Bagus, whose liberal, transparent, and free-market-oriented policy advice was rejected in favor of Mr. Bootle's call for state secrecy and coercion.
Mr. Bootle's statist advice stems from his misunderstanding of basic economics in which he views symptoms as causes. He offers no explanation for Greece's unsustainable debt burden, high cost structure, and high unemployment other than the standard Keynesian explanation of inadequate aggregate demand. Once this fallacious view is swallowed, the prescription follows axiomatically, i.e., devalue the currency to restore competitiveness vis-à-vis foreign markets, which will increase aggregate demand and reduce unemployment. Oh, and the Greeks may have to default on their foreign debt, but history shows that this is not a problem. Really?
Despite his lengthy and repetitive prize submission, Mr. Bootle's recommendations can be summarized in this one sentence: In complete secrecy and with no prior discussion, redenominate all Greek euro-denominated bank accounts into drachma-denominated accounts and devalue the drachma.
That's it! There is no need to cut public spending. Quite the contrary, because public spending adds to the Keynesian concept of aggregate demand, and aggregate demand cannot be allowed to fall. The secrecy part is essential for Mr. Bootle's plan. If the Greek people got wind of what was to happen, they would take measures to protect their property, such as transferring their euro-denominated bank balances to banks in Germany. Mr. Bootle refers to such a development as a crisis, but a crisis for whom? Taking measures to protect one's property would not be a crisis for the common Greek citizen. It would be exercising rational self-interest. Mr. Bootle's so-called plan is nothing more than robbing Greek citizens in the middle of the night!
More
Mises News
October 15, 2012
This summer Roger Bootle won Lord Wolfson's £250,000 prize for the best advice for a country leaving the European Monetary Union (one may assume that this advice is aimed at Greece). A more statist, anti-liberal policy than his could hardly be envisioned, which is a sad commentary on the mindset of the judges chosen by Lord Wolfson. His advice contrasted sharply with that of Dr. Philipp Bagus, whose liberal, transparent, and free-market-oriented policy advice was rejected in favor of Mr. Bootle's call for state secrecy and coercion.
Mr. Bootle's statist advice stems from his misunderstanding of basic economics in which he views symptoms as causes. He offers no explanation for Greece's unsustainable debt burden, high cost structure, and high unemployment other than the standard Keynesian explanation of inadequate aggregate demand. Once this fallacious view is swallowed, the prescription follows axiomatically, i.e., devalue the currency to restore competitiveness vis-à-vis foreign markets, which will increase aggregate demand and reduce unemployment. Oh, and the Greeks may have to default on their foreign debt, but history shows that this is not a problem. Really?
Despite his lengthy and repetitive prize submission, Mr. Bootle's recommendations can be summarized in this one sentence: In complete secrecy and with no prior discussion, redenominate all Greek euro-denominated bank accounts into drachma-denominated accounts and devalue the drachma.
That's it! There is no need to cut public spending. Quite the contrary, because public spending adds to the Keynesian concept of aggregate demand, and aggregate demand cannot be allowed to fall. The secrecy part is essential for Mr. Bootle's plan. If the Greek people got wind of what was to happen, they would take measures to protect their property, such as transferring their euro-denominated bank balances to banks in Germany. Mr. Bootle refers to such a development as a crisis, but a crisis for whom? Taking measures to protect one's property would not be a crisis for the common Greek citizen. It would be exercising rational self-interest. Mr. Bootle's so-called plan is nothing more than robbing Greek citizens in the middle of the night!
More
Only big debt restructuring can save euro
by Willem Buiter
Financial Times
October 15, 2012
During the summer there were a number of developments justifying optimism about the euro’s survival chances. Since late September, however, the euro area’s political leaders have done all they can to dash these hopes.
Among the positives were the decision to enhance the European Stability Mechanism, the rescue fund for troubled nations, allowing the recapitalisation of banks directly without going through the sovereign; the German constitutional court’s approval of the ESM; the emergence of a pro-European majority from the Dutch elections; and the European Central Bank unveiling its big but conditional bazooka, outright monetary operations (OMT).
And then it all went pear-shaped. Germany insists that any direct bank recapitalisation by the ESM be covered by a sovereign guarantee. The distinction between the ESM lending to the sovereign with the sovereign recapitalising its banks – creating an on-balance sheet sovereign liability – and the ESM recapitalising the banks directly but with a guarantee from the sovereign – creating an off-balance sheet contingent sovereign liability – is one of appearance only. Markets will see right through it.
Germany and its allies want the supervisory role of the ECB restricted to a small number of large, mainly cross-border banks. Systemic problems can be created by clusters of domestic banks, as demonstrated by the Landesbanken and cajas. In addition, Germany and the other supporters of a minimalist supervisory role for the ECB want to delay the start of that role and thus also the start of direct bank recapitalisation by the ESM. Finally, the German, Dutch and Finnish finance ministers argue that there should be no mutualisation by the ESM of sovereign debt incurred in past bank recapitalisations, including Spain’s. In the case of Ireland, which incurred about €63bn of sovereign debt recapitalising its banks, this significantly increases risks of an Irish sovereign default.
More
Financial Times
October 15, 2012
During the summer there were a number of developments justifying optimism about the euro’s survival chances. Since late September, however, the euro area’s political leaders have done all they can to dash these hopes.
Among the positives were the decision to enhance the European Stability Mechanism, the rescue fund for troubled nations, allowing the recapitalisation of banks directly without going through the sovereign; the German constitutional court’s approval of the ESM; the emergence of a pro-European majority from the Dutch elections; and the European Central Bank unveiling its big but conditional bazooka, outright monetary operations (OMT).
And then it all went pear-shaped. Germany insists that any direct bank recapitalisation by the ESM be covered by a sovereign guarantee. The distinction between the ESM lending to the sovereign with the sovereign recapitalising its banks – creating an on-balance sheet sovereign liability – and the ESM recapitalising the banks directly but with a guarantee from the sovereign – creating an off-balance sheet contingent sovereign liability – is one of appearance only. Markets will see right through it.
Germany and its allies want the supervisory role of the ECB restricted to a small number of large, mainly cross-border banks. Systemic problems can be created by clusters of domestic banks, as demonstrated by the Landesbanken and cajas. In addition, Germany and the other supporters of a minimalist supervisory role for the ECB want to delay the start of that role and thus also the start of direct bank recapitalisation by the ESM. Finally, the German, Dutch and Finnish finance ministers argue that there should be no mutualisation by the ESM of sovereign debt incurred in past bank recapitalisations, including Spain’s. In the case of Ireland, which incurred about €63bn of sovereign debt recapitalising its banks, this significantly increases risks of an Irish sovereign default.
More
Enough Already With the Strict Austerity in Europe
Bloomberg
Editorial
October 15, 2012
Europe’s economy is likely to shrink this year and to see little or no growth in 2013. Please note: That’s if all goes well. The International Monetary Fund’s dismal new forecasts assume -- or let’s say hope -- that Europe’s plan for restoring stability will soon take effect. Don’t take this for granted.
Output in the euro area will shrink 0.4 percent this year and rise by just 0.2 percent in 2013, according to the new projections. The outlook has worsened since the IMF released its previous forecasts just three months ago. And the risk is that it will worsen further.
With lower growth, the region’s troubled economies face calls for yet more tightening. Spain in particular has announced new spending cuts and tax increases, anticipating the conditions that the European bailout fund will attach to a rescue package. These conditions must be in place before the European Central Bank can start its promised purchases of Spanish government debt.
If the cuts happen, they will further hamper economic growth. Outright political collapse is a risk in Greece. It’s none too remote in Spain, either, where separatist pressures are on the rise.
Enough is enough. Spain has already cut its “structural” or cyclically adjusted budget deficit from almost 10 percent of gross domestic product in 2009 to an expected 3 percent in 2013. Three years ago, Greece had a structural deficit of 18.6 percent of GDP; the IMF says this will fall to 4.5 percent in 2012 and 1.1 percent in 2013. Italy’s structural deficit was an already modest 3 percent in 2009; next year, there’ll be a surplus. All this against the background of shrinking output.
More
Editorial
October 15, 2012
Europe’s economy is likely to shrink this year and to see little or no growth in 2013. Please note: That’s if all goes well. The International Monetary Fund’s dismal new forecasts assume -- or let’s say hope -- that Europe’s plan for restoring stability will soon take effect. Don’t take this for granted.
Output in the euro area will shrink 0.4 percent this year and rise by just 0.2 percent in 2013, according to the new projections. The outlook has worsened since the IMF released its previous forecasts just three months ago. And the risk is that it will worsen further.
With lower growth, the region’s troubled economies face calls for yet more tightening. Spain in particular has announced new spending cuts and tax increases, anticipating the conditions that the European bailout fund will attach to a rescue package. These conditions must be in place before the European Central Bank can start its promised purchases of Spanish government debt.
If the cuts happen, they will further hamper economic growth. Outright political collapse is a risk in Greece. It’s none too remote in Spain, either, where separatist pressures are on the rise.
Enough is enough. Spain has already cut its “structural” or cyclically adjusted budget deficit from almost 10 percent of gross domestic product in 2009 to an expected 3 percent in 2013. Three years ago, Greece had a structural deficit of 18.6 percent of GDP; the IMF says this will fall to 4.5 percent in 2012 and 1.1 percent in 2013. Italy’s structural deficit was an already modest 3 percent in 2009; next year, there’ll be a surplus. All this against the background of shrinking output.
More
Sunday, October 14, 2012
Μέχρι πού μπορεί να φτάσει η κ. Μέρκελ;
του Γιώργου Παγουλάτου
Καθημερινή
14 Οκτωβρίου 2012
Ποια είναι η λέξη που συνοψίζει όλα όσα χρειάζονται για να επιλυθεί η ευρωκρίση; Η ίδια λέξη που προκαλεί ανατριχίλα στον γερμανικό δημόσιο διάλογο: «αναδιανομή». Από τη θεμελίωση του ευρώ, η Γερμανία είχε αποκλείσει μια αναδιανεμητική ένωση (transfer union). Ως η ισχυρότερη οικονομία αποφάσισε ότι δεν θα αποτελέσει τον χρηματοδότη της Eυρωζώνης. Οι γερμανικές πολιτικές δυνάμεις ακροβατούν προσεκτικά στο θέμα αυτό, ιδίως ενόψει των προσεχών εκλογών του φθινοπώρου 2013. Πράσινοι και σοσιαλδημοκράτες το συζητάνε και το υποστηρίζουν, φιλελεύθεροι και χριστιανοκοινωνιστές είναι αντίθετοι. Με τους χριστιανοδημοκράτες διχασμένους, και με ένα νέο συντηρητικό ευρωσκεπτικιστικό κόμμα προ των πυλών, η κ. Μέρκελ προσέχει να αποφεύγει οποιαδήποτε σχετική αναφορά.
Ομως τα δεδομένα της κρίσης είναι αμείλικτα. Η ευρωκρίση δεν μπορεί να αντιμετωπιστεί χωρίς πολιτικές τραπεζικής, δημοσιονομικής και οικονομικής ένωσης. Και η δυναμική του ελληνικού δημόσιου χρέους δεν είναι διατηρήσιμη, απαιτεί αναδιάρθρωση ή «κούρεμα», όπως φρόντισε να μας θυμίσει η κ. Λαγκάρντ. Και τα δύο συνιστούν πολιτικές άμεσης ή έμμεσης αναδιανομής πόρων. Ποια είναι τα όρια πολιτικής αντοχής της κ. Μέρκελ; Η αναδιανομή πόρων στην Eυρωζώνη είναι ήδη πραγματικότητα, με άλλα ονόματα. Ο δανεισμός της Ελλάδας (και των άλλων χωρών σε πρόγραμμα) με επιτόκια χαμηλότερα της αγοράς είναι μια μεταβίβαση πόρων προς την περιφέρεια. Το «κούρεμα» του ελληνικού χρέους με το PSI ακόμα περισσότερο. Τα δάνεια στην περιφέρεια συνιστούν ανάληψη υποχρεώσεων, σε περίπτωση αδυναμίας αποπληρωμής μεταφέρουν πόρους από τους πιστωτές στους οφειλέτες. Το ίδιο και οι αγορές κρατικών ομολόγων από την ΕΚΤ. Συστηματική αναδιανομή θα συνιστούσαν η μετάβαση προς τραπεζική ένωση αμοιβαίας ανάληψης τραπεζικών κινδύνων, η έκδοση ευρωομολόγων, η δημιουργία ομοσπονδιακού προϋπολογισμού Eυρωζώνης. Ολα αυτά είναι αναγκαία για την επιβίωση του ευρώ. Το ερώτημα είναι: μπορούν να γίνουν αποδεκτά από τη Γερμανία;
Περισσότερα
Καθημερινή
14 Οκτωβρίου 2012
Ποια είναι η λέξη που συνοψίζει όλα όσα χρειάζονται για να επιλυθεί η ευρωκρίση; Η ίδια λέξη που προκαλεί ανατριχίλα στον γερμανικό δημόσιο διάλογο: «αναδιανομή». Από τη θεμελίωση του ευρώ, η Γερμανία είχε αποκλείσει μια αναδιανεμητική ένωση (transfer union). Ως η ισχυρότερη οικονομία αποφάσισε ότι δεν θα αποτελέσει τον χρηματοδότη της Eυρωζώνης. Οι γερμανικές πολιτικές δυνάμεις ακροβατούν προσεκτικά στο θέμα αυτό, ιδίως ενόψει των προσεχών εκλογών του φθινοπώρου 2013. Πράσινοι και σοσιαλδημοκράτες το συζητάνε και το υποστηρίζουν, φιλελεύθεροι και χριστιανοκοινωνιστές είναι αντίθετοι. Με τους χριστιανοδημοκράτες διχασμένους, και με ένα νέο συντηρητικό ευρωσκεπτικιστικό κόμμα προ των πυλών, η κ. Μέρκελ προσέχει να αποφεύγει οποιαδήποτε σχετική αναφορά.
Ομως τα δεδομένα της κρίσης είναι αμείλικτα. Η ευρωκρίση δεν μπορεί να αντιμετωπιστεί χωρίς πολιτικές τραπεζικής, δημοσιονομικής και οικονομικής ένωσης. Και η δυναμική του ελληνικού δημόσιου χρέους δεν είναι διατηρήσιμη, απαιτεί αναδιάρθρωση ή «κούρεμα», όπως φρόντισε να μας θυμίσει η κ. Λαγκάρντ. Και τα δύο συνιστούν πολιτικές άμεσης ή έμμεσης αναδιανομής πόρων. Ποια είναι τα όρια πολιτικής αντοχής της κ. Μέρκελ; Η αναδιανομή πόρων στην Eυρωζώνη είναι ήδη πραγματικότητα, με άλλα ονόματα. Ο δανεισμός της Ελλάδας (και των άλλων χωρών σε πρόγραμμα) με επιτόκια χαμηλότερα της αγοράς είναι μια μεταβίβαση πόρων προς την περιφέρεια. Το «κούρεμα» του ελληνικού χρέους με το PSI ακόμα περισσότερο. Τα δάνεια στην περιφέρεια συνιστούν ανάληψη υποχρεώσεων, σε περίπτωση αδυναμίας αποπληρωμής μεταφέρουν πόρους από τους πιστωτές στους οφειλέτες. Το ίδιο και οι αγορές κρατικών ομολόγων από την ΕΚΤ. Συστηματική αναδιανομή θα συνιστούσαν η μετάβαση προς τραπεζική ένωση αμοιβαίας ανάληψης τραπεζικών κινδύνων, η έκδοση ευρωομολόγων, η δημιουργία ομοσπονδιακού προϋπολογισμού Eυρωζώνης. Ολα αυτά είναι αναγκαία για την επιβίωση του ευρώ. Το ερώτημα είναι: μπορούν να γίνουν αποδεκτά από τη Γερμανία;
Περισσότερα
Letting Greece off the hook is a moral issue for many Germans
by Phillip Inman
Guardian
October 14, 2012
When shopaholics find all their credit cards are maxed out and they've lost their job they only have two options. They can stare into the middle distance while all their possessions are taken away one by one, or they can contact their creditors.
It is always better to find a go-between such as Citizens Advice, which can arbitrate and will usually persuade angry lenders that a customer who loses their job cannot pay all the money back.
The International Monetary Fund rejected the intermediary role in the aftermath of the financial crisis. When, in 2010, euroland's most indebted shopaholic, Greece, found itself without enough income to cover debt payments, the IMF sided with her creditors. It told Athens to repay the lot in a scheme arranged by Germany, France and the other northern European creditor countries that backed the deal.
However, once the IMF joined as a creditor in this new repayment programme, it realised officials had made a serious miscalculation. Greece had no money to pay back its debts. The Washington-based super-bank arranged a 50% write-down and told Germany to live with losses. Greece struggled on.
More
Guardian
October 14, 2012
When shopaholics find all their credit cards are maxed out and they've lost their job they only have two options. They can stare into the middle distance while all their possessions are taken away one by one, or they can contact their creditors.
It is always better to find a go-between such as Citizens Advice, which can arbitrate and will usually persuade angry lenders that a customer who loses their job cannot pay all the money back.
The International Monetary Fund rejected the intermediary role in the aftermath of the financial crisis. When, in 2010, euroland's most indebted shopaholic, Greece, found itself without enough income to cover debt payments, the IMF sided with her creditors. It told Athens to repay the lot in a scheme arranged by Germany, France and the other northern European creditor countries that backed the deal.
However, once the IMF joined as a creditor in this new repayment programme, it realised officials had made a serious miscalculation. Greece had no money to pay back its debts. The Washington-based super-bank arranged a 50% write-down and told Germany to live with losses. Greece struggled on.
More
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)