Christian Science Monitor
May 7, 2012
Both the French presidential and the Greek parliamentary elections yesterday were pretty bad. The Greek election meant a choice between on the one hand incompetent and corrupt incumbents that have wrecked the country and on the other hand extreme left wing parties and an outright neo-Nazi party who promises that Greece as a nation will continue to be able to live at the expense of other nations.
The French election meant pretty much the same choice, except that Sarkozy wasn't as bad as the Greek incumbents and Hollande isn't as bad as the Greek opposition of left-wing extremists and neo-Nazis. In both cases, a majority of voters decided to throw out the incompetent incumbents and instead go for the even crazier opposition. In a way that is understandable. As one commenter put it, it was basically insolent for Greece's two leading (until this election) parties, New Democracy and Pasok, to ask voters to give them power again after the problems they've caused. And though France has performed much better than Greece in recent years, the French economy has still been quite weak.
But just because the incumbents are incompetent fools who have wrecked the countries, doesn't mean that the opposition is better, as the people of Germany (and the rest of the world) experienced after they voted out the incompetent and corrupt Weimar German establishment and voted in the National Socialist German Worker's Party (the NSDAP in its German abbreviation) into power in 1932.
More
No comments:
Post a Comment